Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24637132›Full record

ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2014

A phase I study of fludarabine, cytarabine, and oxaliplatin therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou, Michael J Keating, Elias J Jabbour, Farhad Ravandi-Kashani, Susan O'Brien, Elihu Estey, Neby Bekele, William K Plunkett, Hagop Kantarjian, Gautam Borthakur

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Apostolia Maria TsimberidouDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: atsimber@mdanderson.org.
Michael J KeatingDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Elias J JabbourDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Farhad Ravandi-KashaniDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Susan O'BrienDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Elihu EsteyDivision of Hematology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Neby BekeleGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA.
William K PlunkettDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Hagop KantarjianDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Gautam BorthakurDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe combination of cytarabine and fludarabine was associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with those of high-dose cytarabine in relapse acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted a phase I study combining oxaliplatin with cytarabine and fludarabine therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory AML. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween January 2008 and November 2009, 27 patients were registered in the study. Patients had histologically confirmed disease, performance status 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. The treatment regimen consisted of increasing doses of oxaliplatin (25, 30, or 35 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 to 4 (escalation phase), and fludarabine (30 mg/m²) and cytarabine (500 mg/m²) on days 2 to 6, every 28 days for ≤ 6 cycles. The dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any symptomatic grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity lasting ≥ 3 days and involving a major organ system.

resultsOf 27 patients, 12 were treated in the dose-escalation phase and 15 at the maximum tolerated dose for oxaliplatin (30 mg/m²; expansion phase). All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Only 1 patient received the second cycle; the remaining patients received no further study treatment, owing to slow recovery from toxicities or physician decision. Grade 3-4 drug-related toxicities included diarrhea (grade 4) and elevated levels of bilirubin (grade 3) and aspartate transaminase (grade 3). In all, 3 patients had a complete remission and 2 patients complete response without platelet recovery.

conclusionOxaliplatin, cytarabine, and fludarabine therapy had antileukemic activity in patients with poor-risk AML, but it was associated with toxicity. Different schedules and doses may be better tolerated.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildCytarabineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansHyperbilirubinemiaLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedCytarabinefludarabineOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinVidarabineDLTHigh-risk MDSPoor-riskResponseToxicity

Identifiers

PMID24637132
PMCPMC4387892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.