Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24636669›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2014

Histopathological features of bone regeneration in a canine segmental ulnar defect model.

Rahim Hobbenaghi, Pariya Mahboob, Siamak Saifzadeh, Javad Javanbakht, Javad Yaghoobi Yeganeh Manesh, Rasool Mortezaee, Seyed Rashid Touni, Ehsan Hosseini, Shahin Aghajanshakeri, Milad Moloudizargari and 1 more

RetractedErratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in Animal Models for Studying Bone Fracture Healing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rahim Hobbenaghi
Pariya Mahboob
Siamak Saifzadeh
Javad JavanbakhtDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. javadpatho@gmail.com.
Javad Yaghoobi Yeganeh Manesh
Rasool Mortezaee
Seyed Rashid Touni
Ehsan Hosseini
Shahin Aghajanshakeri
Milad Moloudizargari
Soheil Javaherypour
Urmia University · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRIlam University · IRQueensland University of Technology · AUShahrekord University · IRUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToday, finding an ideal biomaterial to treat the large bone defects, delayed unions and non-unions remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeions and researchers. Several studies have been carried out on the subject of bone regeneration, each having its own advantages. The present study has been designed in vivo to evaluate the effects of cellular auto-transplantation of tail vertebrae on healing of experimental critical bone defect in a dog model.

methodsSix indigenous breeds of dog with 32 ± 3.6 kg average weight from both sexes (5 males and 1 female) received bilateral critical-sized ulnar segmental defects. After determining the health condition, divided to 2 groups: The Group I were kept as control I (n = 1) while in Group II (experimental group; n = 5) bioactive bone implants were inserted. The defects were implanted with either autogeneic coccygeal bone grafts in dogs with 3-4 cm diaphyseal defects in the ulna. Defects were stabilized with internal plate fixation, and the control defects were not stabilized. Animals were euthanized at 16 weeks and analyzed by histopathology.

resultsHistological evaluation of this new bone at sixteen weeks postoperatively revealed primarily lamellar bone, with the formation of new cortices and normal-appearing marrow elements. And also reformation cortical compartment and reconstitution of marrow space were observed at the graft-host interface together with graft resorption and necrosis responses. Finally, our data were consistent with the osteoconducting function of the tail autograft.

conclusionsOur results suggested that the tail vertebrae autograft seemed to be a new source of autogenous cortical bone in order to supporting segmental long bone defects in dogs. Furthermore, cellular autotransplantation was found to be a successful replacement for the tail vertebrae allograft bone at 3-4 cm segmental defects in the canine mid- ulna. Clinical application using graft expanders or bone autotransplantation should be used carefully and requires further investigation. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/2028232688119271.

Indexed as

UlnaAnimalsBone RegenerationBone TransplantationDisease Models, AnimalDogsFemaleMaleTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID24636669
PMCPMC3995496
OpenAlexW2169171610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.