Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24636343›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2014

Perceived and objective diet quality in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Tiffany M Powell-Wiley, Paige E Miller, Priscilla Agyemang, Tanya Agurs-Collins, Jill Reedy

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tiffany M Powell-Wiley1Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Branch,Division of Intramural Research,National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute,National Institutes of Health,Building 10 - Room 5E3340,Bethesda,MD 20892,USA.
Paige E Miller2Applied Research Program,Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences,National Cancer Institute,National Institutes of Health,Bethesda,MD,USA.
Priscilla Agyemang1Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Branch,Division of Intramural Research,National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute,National Institutes of Health,Building 10 - Room 5E3340,Bethesda,MD 20892,USA.
Tanya Agurs-Collins4Health Behaviors Research Branch,Behavioral Research Program,Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences,National Cancer Institute,National Institutes of Health,Bethesda,MD,USA.
Jill Reedy2Applied Research Program,Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences,National Cancer Institute,National Institutes of Health,Bethesda,MD,USA.

Funding

Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment in Washington D.C.ZIAHL006168 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI POWELL-WILEY, TIFFANY · 2013 to 2025
$8.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HL006168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern has been shown to reduce cardiometabolic risk. Little is understood about the relationship between objective diet quality and perceived diet quality (PDQ), a potential psychosocial barrier to appropriate dietary intake. We compared PDQ and diet quality measured by a nutrient-based DASH index score in the USA.

designCross-sectional study. Participants in the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) rated diet quality on a 5-point Likert scale and PDQ scores were generated (low, medium, high). A single 24 h dietary recall was used to estimate DASH index scores (range 0-9 points) by assigning 0, 0·5 or 1 point (optimal) for nine target nutrients: total fat, saturated fat, protein, cholesterol, fibre, Ca, Mg, K and Na.

settingNationally representative sample of the US population. SUBJECTS: Adults aged ≥19 years in 2005-2006 NHANES (n 4419).

resultsParticipants with high PDQ (33 %) had higher DASH index scores (mean 3·0 (sd 0·07)) than those with low PDQ (mean 2·5 (sd 0·06), P < 0·001), but average scores did not align with targets for intermediate or optimal DASH accordance. Adults with high PDQ reported higher total fat, saturated fat and Na intakes compared with optimal DASH nutrient goals. Differences between those with high v. low PDQ were similar for Whites and Blacks, but there was no difference between PDQ groups for Mexican Americans.

conclusionsAmong Whites and Blacks, but not Mexican Americans, high PDQ may be associated with higher diet quality, but not necessarily a diet meeting DASH nutrient goals. This disconnect between PDQ and actual diet quality may serve as a target in obesity prevention.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritive ValuePerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID24636343
PMCPMC4190093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.