Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24636151›Full record

ArticleClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2015

Accuracy of a simplified equation for energy expenditure based on bedside volumetric carbon dioxide elimination measurement--a two-center study.

Nilesh M Mehta, Craig D Smallwood, Koen F M Joosten, Jessie M Hulst, Robert C Tasker, Christopher P Duggan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nilesh M MehtaBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: nilesh.mehta@childrens.harvard.edu.
Craig D SmallwoodBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Koen F M JoostenErasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jessie M HulstErasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Robert C TaskerBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Christopher P DugganBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

ROLE OF DIETARY CONSTITUENTS ON GENE EXPRESSION IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMP30DK040561 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Elizabeth Austen Lawson, Takara Leah Stanley · 1994 to 2026
$31.6M
Patient-oriented Research in Pediatric Diarrheal DiseasesK24HD058795 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI DUGGAN, CHRISTOPHER P · 2010 to 2014
$956k
NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD058795NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK040561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsAccurate assessment of resting energy expenditure (REE) and metabolic state is essential to optimize nutrient intake in critically ill patients. We aimed to examine the accuracy of a simplified equation for predicting REE using carbon dioxide elimination (VCO2) values.

methodsWe conducted a two-center study of metabolic data from mechanically ventilated children less than 18 years of age. Mean respiratory quotient (RQ) from the derivation set (n = 72 subjects) was used to modify the Weir equation to obtain a simplified equation based on VCO2 measurements alone. This equation was then applied to subjects at the second institution (validation dataset, n = 94) to predict resting energy expenditure. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between measured REE values, and REE estimated by the new equation as well as the Schofield equation. We also examined the accuracy of the new equation in classifying patients according to their metabolic state.

resultsMean respiratory quotient (± SD) of 0.89 ± 0.09 in the derivation set was used to obtain a simplified equation, REE (kcal/day) = 5.534*VCO2 (L/min)*1440. In relation to the measured REE in the validation set, the mean bias (limits of agreement) for the REE predicted by this equation was -0.65% (-14.4-13.1%); and the overall diagnostic accuracy for classifying subjects as hypometabolic or hypermetabolic was 84%. Mean bias (limits) of agreement between measured and Schofield equation estimated REE was -0.1% (-40.5-40.7%).

conclusionsA simplified metabolic equation using VCO2 values was superior to the standard equation in estimating REE, and provided a reasonably accurate metabolic classification in mechanically ventilated children. In the absence of indirect calorimetry, bedside VCO2 monitoring could provide valuable continuous metabolic information to guide optimal nutrient intake.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismPoint-of-Care SystemsAdolescentCalorimetry, IndirectCarbon DioxideChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessHumansInfantMathematical ConceptsMonitoring, PhysiologicPulmonary Gas ExchangeReproducibility of ResultsRespiration, ArtificialRestCarbon DioxideEnergy expenditureIndirect calorimetryMetabolic assessmentRespiratory quotientVCO(2)

Identifiers

PMID24636151
PMCPMC4670754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.