Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24636070›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2014

Next-generation transcriptome sequencing of the premenopausal breast epithelium using specimens from a normal human breast tissue bank.

Ivanesa Pardo, Heather A Lillemoe, Rachel J Blosser, MiRan Choi, Candice A M Sauder, Diane K Doxey, Theresa Mathieson, Bradley A Hancock, Dadrie Baptiste, Rutuja Atale and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hormone Signaling in Breast Development and Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Progesterone and Breast Cancer.Endocrine reviews · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Ivanesa Pardo
Heather A Lillemoe
Rachel J Blosser
MiRan Choi
Candice A M Sauder
Diane K Doxey
Theresa Mathieson
Bradley A Hancock
Dadrie Baptiste
Rutuja Atale
Matthew Hickenbotham
Jin Zhu
Jarret Glasscock
Anna Maria V Storniolo
Faye Zheng
R W Doerge
Yunlong Liu
Sunil Badve
Milan Radovich
Susan E Clare
Susan G. Komen for the Cure Tissue Bank at the IU Simon Cancer Center

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sara K Quinney · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
Cancer Biology Training ProgramT32CA111198 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI NAKSHATRI, HARIKRISHNA · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1 T32 CA 111198NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur efforts to prevent and treat breast cancer are significantly impeded by a lack of knowledge of the biology and developmental genetics of the normal mammary gland. In order to provide the specimens that will facilitate such an understanding, The Susan G. Komen for the Cure Tissue Bank at the IU Simon Cancer Center (KTB) was established. The KTB is, to our knowledge, the only biorepository in the world prospectively established to collect normal, healthy breast tissue from volunteer donors. As a first initiative toward a molecular understanding of the biology and developmental genetics of the normal mammary gland, the effect of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptives on DNA expression in the normal breast epithelium was examined.

methodsUsing normal breast tissue from 20 premenopausal donors to KTB, the changes in the mRNA of the normal breast epithelium as a function of phase of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraception were assayed using next-generation whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq).

resultsIn total, 255 genes representing 1.4% of all genes were deemed to have statistically significant differential expression between the two phases of the menstrual cycle. The overwhelming majority (221; 87%) of the genes have higher expression during the luteal phase. These data provide important insights into the processes occurring during each phase of the menstrual cycle. There was only a single gene significantly differentially expressed when comparing the epithelium of women using hormonal contraception to those in the luteal phase.

conclusionsWe have taken advantage of a unique research resource, the KTB, to complete the first-ever next-generation transcriptome sequencing of the epithelial compartment of 20 normal human breast specimens. This work has produced a comprehensive catalog of the differences in the expression of protein-coding genes as a function of the phase of the menstrual cycle. These data constitute the beginning of a reference data set of the normal mammary gland, which can be consulted for comparison with data developed from malignant specimens, or to mine the effects of the hormonal flux that occurs during the menstrual cycle.

Indexed as

Tissue BanksAdultAlgorithmsBreastEpitheliumFemaleFollicular PhaseGene Regulatory NetworksHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLinear ModelsLuteal PhaseMiddle AgedPremenopauseReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID24636070
PMCPMC4053088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.