ArticleSource code for biology and medicine2014
Identifying large sets of unrelated individuals and unrelated markers.
Article in Source code for biology and medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Uncovering associations between pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 Severity: A polygenic risk score approach across three large biobanks.PLoS genetics · 2023Pooled it
- plmmr: an R package to fit penalized linear mixed models for genome-wide association data with complex correlation structure.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Kinship Decouple and Phenotype Selection (KDPS): a tool for phenotype-aware decoupling of related subjects.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Improving prediction models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) using polygenic, pre-existing conditions, and survey-based risk scores in the UK Biobank.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Improving prediction models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) using polygenic, pre-existing conditions, and survey-based risk scores in the UK Biobank.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Polygenic Liability to Depression Is Associated With Multiple Medical Conditions in the Electronic Health Record: Phenome-wide Association Study of 46,782 Individuals.Biological psychiatry · 2022Article
- ExPRSweb: An online repository with polygenic risk scores for common health-related exposures.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- COX7A2L genetic variants determine cardiorespiratory fitness in mice and human.Nature metabolism · 2022Article
- On cross-ancestry cancer polygenic risk scores.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Cancer PRSweb: An Online Repository with Polygenic Risk Scores for Major Cancer Traits and Their Evaluation in Two Independent Biobanks.American journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- A Fast and Accurate Method for Genome-Wide Time-to-Event Data Analysis and Its Application to UK Biobank.American journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- The emerging landscape of health research based on biobanks linked to electronic health records: Existing resources, statistical challenges, and potential opportunities.Statistics in medicine · 2020Article
- Genetic polymorphisms associated with sleep-related phenotypes; relationships with individual nocturnal symptoms of insomnia in the HUNT study.BMC medical genetics · 2019Article
- Exploring various polygenic risk scores for skin cancer in the phenomes of the Michigan genomics initiative and the UK Biobank with a visual catalog: PRSWeb.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Inferring Identical-by-Descent Sharing of Sample Ancestors Promotes High-Resolution Relative Detection.American journal of human genetics · 2018Article
- Electronic health records: the next wave of complex disease genetics.Human molecular genetics · 2018Review
- Benchmarking Relatedness Inference Methods with Genome-Wide Data from Thousands of Relatives.Genetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic Analyses in large sample populations are important for a better understanding of the variation between populations, for designing conservation programs, for detecting rare mutations which may be risk factors for a variety of diseases, among other reasons. However these analyses frequently assume that the participating individuals or animals are mutually unrelated which may not be the case in large samples, leading to erroneous conclusions. In order to retain as much data as possible while minimizing the risk of false positives it is useful to identify a large subset of relatively unrelated individuals in the population. This can be done using a heuristic for finding a large set of independent of nodes in an undirected graph. We describe a fast randomized heuristic for this purpose. The same methodology can also be used for identifying a suitable set of markers for analyzing population stratification, and other instances where a rapid heuristic for maximal independent sets in large graphs is needed.
resultsWe present FastIndep, a fast random heuristic algorithm for finding a maximal independent set of nodes in an arbitrary undirected graph along with an efficient implementation in C++. On a 64 bit Linux or MacOS platform the execution time is a few minutes, even with a graph of several thousand nodes. The algorithm can discover multiple solutions of the same cardinality. FastIndep can be used to discover unlinked markers, and unrelated individuals in populations.
conclusionsThe methods presented here provide a quick and efficient method for identifying sets of unrelated individuals in large populations and unlinked markers in marker panels. The C++ source code and instructions along with utilities for generating the input files in the appropriate format are available at http://taurus.ansci.iastate.edu/wiki/people/jabr/Joseph_Abraham.html.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.