Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24635640›Full record

ReviewJournal of anatomy2014

Mechanoadaptation of developing limbs: shaking a leg.

A S Pollard, I M McGonnell, A A Pitsillides

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anatomy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07360574 (Piezo2-related Arthrogryposis & physiopathOLOgy 3), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07360574 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Piezo2-related Arthrogryposis & physiopathOLOgy 3

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2026 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsArthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita, Piezo2 Mutation Gain of Function
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanoepigenetics in musculoskeletal disease.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Stresses and strains on the human fetal skeleton during development.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A S PollardComparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
I M McGonnell
A A Pitsillides
Royal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proportion of total limb length taken up by the individual skeletal elements (limb proportionality), varies widely between species. These diverse skeletal forms have evolved to allow for a range of limb uses and they first emerge as the embryo develops, to achieve the characteristic skeletal architecture of each species. During this time, the developing skeleton experiences mechanical loading as a result of embryonic muscle contraction. The possibility that adaptation to such mechanical input may allow embryos to coordinate the appearance of skeletal design with their expanding range of movements has so far received little attention. This is surprising, given the critical role exerted by embryo movement in normal skeletal development; stage-specific in ovo immobilisation of embryonic chicks results in joint contractures and a reduction in longitudinal bone growth in the limbs. Epigenetic mechanisms allow for selective activation of genes in response to environmental signals, resulting in the production of phenotypic complexity in morphogenesis; mechanical loading of bone during movement appears to be one such signal. It may be that 'mechanosensitive' genes under regulation of mechanical input adjust proportionality along the bone's proximo-distal axis, introducing a level of phenotypic plasticity. If this hypothesis is upheld, species with more elongated distal limb elements will have a greater dependence on mechanical input for the differences in their growth, and mechanosensitive bone growth in the embryo may have evolved as an additional source of phenotypic diversity during skeletal development.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone DevelopmentEmbryo, MammalianExtremitiesHumansMovementOrganogenesisSpecies Specificityembryo movementepigeneticslimb developmentmechanical loading

Identifiers

PMID24635640
PMCPMC4025889
OpenAlexW2031766506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.