Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24634163›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2014

Dose-specific adverse drug reaction identification in electronic patient records: temporal data mining in an inpatient psychiatric population.

Robert Eriksson, Thomas Werge, Lars Juhl Jensen, Søren Brunak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Performance of Trigger Tools in Identifying Adverse Drug Events in Emergency Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The digital revolution in phenotyping.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016
    Article
  15. 'Big data' in mental health research: current status and emerging possibilities.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The SIDER database of drugs and side effects.Nucleic acids research · 2016
    Article
  18. Handling Temporality of Clinical Events for Drug Safety Surveillance.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert ErikssonNNF Center for Protein Research, Department of Disease Systems Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas Werge
Lars Juhl Jensen
Søren Brunak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData collected for medical, filing and administrative purposes in electronic patient records (EPRs) represent a rich source of individualised clinical data, which has great potential for improved detection of patients experiencing adverse drug reactions (ADRs), across all approved drugs and across all indication areas.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to take advantage of techniques for temporal data mining of EPRs in order to detect ADRs in a patient- and dose-specific manner.

methodsWe used a psychiatric hospital's EPR system to investigate undesired drug effects. Within one workflow the method identified patient-specific adverse events (AEs) and links these to specific drugs and dosages in a temporal manner, based on integration of text mining results and structured data. The structured data contained precise information on drug identity, dosage and strength.

resultsWhen applying the method to the 3,394 patients in the cohort, we identified AEs linked with a drug in 2,402 patients (70.8 %). Of the 43,528 patient-specific drug substances prescribed, 14,736 (33.9 %) were linked with AEs. From these links we identified multiple ADRs (p < 0.05) and found them to occur at similar frequencies, as stated by the manufacturer and in the literature. We showed that drugs displaying similar ADR profiles share targets, and we compared submitted spontaneous AE reports with our findings. For nine of the ten most prescribed antipsychotics in the patient population, larger doses were prescribed to sedated patients than non-sedated patients; five antipsychotics [corrected] exhibited a significant difference (p<0.05). Finally, we present two cases (p < 0.05) identified by the workflow. The method identified the potentially fatal AE QT prolongation caused by methadone, and a non-described likely ADR between levomepromazine and nightmares found among the hundreds of identified novel links between drugs and AEs (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe developed method can be used to extract dose-dependent ADR information from already collected EPR data. Large-scale AE extraction from EPRs may complement or even replace current drug safety monitoring methods in the future, reducing or eliminating manual reporting and enabling much faster ADR detection.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overAntipsychotic AgentsData CollectionData MiningDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24634163
PMCPMC3975083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.