Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24633840›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2014

Evolving concepts in breast lobular neoplasia and invasive lobular carcinoma, and their impact on imaging methods.

Tatiane M G Oliveira, Jorge Elias, Andrea F Melo, Sara R Teixeira, Salomão C Filho, Larissa M Gonçalves, Francesca M Faria, Daniel G Tiezzi, Jurandyr M Andrade, Valdair Muglia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes Among Women With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lobular carcinomaArchives of medical science : AMS · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Lobular breast cancer series: imaging.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiane M G OliveiraDepartment of Internal Medicine (Imaging Division), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo at Ribeirao Preto, 3900 Bandeirantes Ave, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Jorge Elias
Andrea F Melo
Sara R Teixeira
Salomão C Filho
Larissa M Gonçalves
Francesca M Faria
Daniel G Tiezzi
Jurandyr M Andrade
Valdair Muglia
Universidade de São Paulo · BRClinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and lobular neoplasia (LN) are two distinct conditions that still pose challenges regarding to their classification, diagnosis and management. Although they share similar cellular characteristics, such as discohesive neoplastic cells and absence of e-cadherin staining, they represent completely different conditions. LN encompasses atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), which are currently considered risk factors and non-obligatory precursors of breast neoplasia. These lesions are diagnosed as incidental findings in percutaneous biopsies or appear as non-specific clusters of punctate calcifications in mammograms. ILC is the second most common breast malignancy and has typical histological features, such as infiltrative growth and low desmoplasia. These histological features are reflected in imaging findings and constitute the reasons for typical subtle mammographic features of ILC, as architectural distortion or focal asymmetries. Ultrasonography (US) may detect almost 75 % of the ILCs missed by mammography and represents the modality of choice for guiding biopsies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exhibits a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of ILC and for detecting synchronous lesions. Teaching Points • LN includes ALH and LCIS, risk factors and non-obligatory precursors of breast cancer.• Absence of e-cadherin staining is crucial for differentiation among ductal and lobular lesions. • ILC has typical histological features, such as infiltrative growth and low desmoplasia. • Mammographic features of ILC are often subtle and reflect the histological features. • MRI exhibits a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of ILC and for detecting synchronous lesions.

Identifiers

PMID24633840
PMCPMC3999371
OpenAlexW2007184258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.