Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24633760›Full record

Trial reportClinical cardiology2014

Choice of vein-harvest technique for coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of the REGROUP trial.

Marco A Zenati, J Michael Gaziano, Joseph F Collins, Kousick Biswas, Jennifer M Gabany, Jacquelyn A Quin, Jerene M Bitondo, Faisal G Bakaeen, Rosemary F Kelly, A Laurie Shroyer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01850082 (CSP #588 - Randomized Endo-Vein Graft Prospective), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01850082 nacompletednot on this map

CSP #588 - Randomized Endo-Vein Graft Prospective (REGROUP) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2013 to 2020Enrolled1,150ConditionsCoronary Artery Bypass GraftingArmsVein Harvesting Procedures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current role of saphenous vein graft in coronary artery bypass grafting.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marco A ZenatiDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Surgical Service, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System.
J Michael Gaziano
Joseph F Collins
Kousick Biswas
Jennifer M Gabany
Jacquelyn A Quin
Jerene M Bitondo
Faisal G Bakaeen
Rosemary F Kelly
A Laurie Shroyer
Deepak L Bhatt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Randomized Endo-vein Graft Prospective (REGROUP) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01850082) is a randomized, intent-to-treat, 2-arm, parallel-design, multicenter study funded by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP No. 588) of the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Cardiac surgeons at 16 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers with technical expertise in performing both endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) and open vein harvesting (OVH) were recruited as the REGROUP surgeon participants. Subjects requiring elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass with use of ≥1 saphenous vein graft will be screened for enrollment using pre-established inclusion/exclusion criteria. Enrolled subjects (planned N = 1150) will be randomized to 1 of the 2 arms (EVH or OVH) after an experienced vein harvester has been assigned. The primary outcomes measure is the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization. Subject assessments will be performed at multiple times, including at baseline, intraoperatively, postoperatively, and at discharge (or 30 days after surgery, if still hospitalized). Assessment of leg-wound complications will be completed at 6 weeks after surgery. Telephone follow-ups will occur at 3-month intervals after surgery until the participating sites are decommissioned after the trial's completion (approximately 4.5 years after the full study startup). To assess long-term outcomes, centralized follow-up of MACE for 2 additional years will be centrally performed using VA and non-VA clinical and administrative databases. The primary MACE outcome will be compared between the 2 arms, EVH and OVH, at the end of the trial duration.

Indexed as

AdultCoronary Artery BypassEndoscopyHumansResearch DesignSaphenous VeinTissue and Organ Harvesting

Identifiers

PMID24633760
PMCPMC6649498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.