ArticleJournal of community health2014
Parents' decisions about HPV vaccine for sons: the importance of protecting sons' future female partners.
Article in Journal of community health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Literature Review of HPV Vaccination Barriers Among Adolescent and Young Adult Males.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a Health Talk Education Program on Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Knowledge, Attitudes, and Intentions to Vaccinate Children Among Mothers of Secondary School Boys in Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
- Using Intervention Mapping to Develop and Adapt Two Educational Interventions for Parents to Increase HPV Vaccination Among Hispanic Adolescents.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Parents' views of including young boys in the Swedish national school-based HPV vaccination programme: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parents' decisions about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for sons may be influenced by potentially protecting sons' future female partners from HPV. We sought to identify characteristics of parents likely to consider future partner protection in vaccine decisions, and to determine if parents likely to consider future partners in vaccine decisions had greater intention to vaccinate. We performed a cross-sectional survey of parents with sons in a pediatric clinic in 2010. We used Fisher's exact tests to identify demographics associated with consideration of future female partners in vaccine decisions. We used adjusted logistic regression to determine if parents likely to consider future partner protection in vaccine decisions had greater intention to vaccinate sons. Most parents (76 %, 187/246) reported vaccine decisions for sons were likely to be influenced by preventing HPV transmission from sons to their female partners. Parents 40 years and older, White and Black parents (vs other race), non-Hispanic, and college-educated parents were significantly more likely to indicate female partner protection may influence vaccine decisions (p < 0.05). Parents likely to be influenced by female partner protection in vaccine decisions had greater intention to vaccinate sons than their counterparts (adjusted odds ratio 2.54, 95 % CI 1.22, 5.28). Overall, many parents were likely to consider sons' female partners in vaccine decisions. Because parents likely to consider female partners had increased intention to vaccinate sons, future efforts to improve vaccine uptake in boys should explore the benefits of highlighting potential female partner protection, as this concept may resonate with many parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.