Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24633725›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2014

Health literacy and pap testing in insured women.

K M Mazor, A E Williams, D W Roblin, B Gaglio, S L Cutrona, M E Costanza, P K J Han, J L Wagner, H Fouayzi, T S Field

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Exploring Health Literacy and the Correlates of Pap Testing Among African Immigrant Women: Findings from the AfroPap Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Decisional balance and self-efficacy mediate the association among provider advice, health literacy and cervical cancer screening.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

K M MazorMeyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 630 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA, Kathy.Mazor@meyersprimary.org.
A E Williams
D W Roblin
B Gaglio
S L Cutrona
M E Costanza
P K J Han
J L Wagner
H Fouayzi
T S Field

Funding

The HMO Cancer Research Network (CRN)U19CA079689 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI WAGNER, EDWARD H · 1999 to 2011
$62.6M
Training and DevelopmentP20CA137219 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DEARING, JAMES WILLIAM · 2008 to 2012
$7.8M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2RR031981 · NCRR · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SULLIVAN, JOHN LEWIS · 2010 to 2011
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA137219NCI NIH HHS U19 CA079689NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR031981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have found a link between health literacy and participation in cancer screening. Most, however, have relied on self-report to determine screening status. Further, until now, health literacy measures have assessed print literacy only. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between participation in cervical cancer screening (Papanicolaou [Pap] testing) and two forms of health literacy-reading and listening. A demographically diverse sample was recruited from a pool of insured women in Georgia, Massachusetts, Hawaii, and Colorado between June 2009 and April 2010. Health literacy was assessed using the Cancer Message Literacy Test-Listening and the Cancer Message Literacy Test-Reading. Adherence to cervical cancer screening was ascertained through electronic administrative data on Pap test utilization. The relationship between health literacy and adherence to evidence-based recommendations for Pap testing was examined using multivariate logistic regression models. Data from 527 women aged 40 to 65 were analyzed and are reported here. Of these 527 women, 397 (75 %) were up to date with Pap testing. Higher health literacy scores for listening but not reading predicted being up to date. The fact that health literacy listening was associated with screening behavior even in this insured population suggests that it has independent effects beyond those of access to care. Patients who have difficulty understanding spoken recommendations about cancer screening may be at risk for underutilizing screening as a result.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyInsurance, HealthVaginal SmearsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24633725
PMCPMC4168007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.