Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24633719›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2014

What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.

Carlo Ammendolia, Kent Stuber, Christy Tomkins-Lane, Michael Schneider, Y Raja Rampersaud, Andrea D Furlan, Carol A Kennedy

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02592642 nacompletednot on this map

Self-Management to Improve Walking Ability in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: the Evaluation of Four Novel Strategies.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMount Sinai Hospital, CanadaRan2014 to 2017Enrolled104ConditionsDegenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisArmsSelf-management Program, Workbook, Video, Pedometer, Instructional Workbook, Video, and Pedometer, Para-spinal TENS, Para-spinal Placebo TENS, Prototype Spinal Stenosis Belt
NCT04079894 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Physical Activity in the Elderly Spine Patient

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMalin Eleonora av Kák Gustafsson, MDRan2019 to 2023Enrolled206ConditionsLumbar Spinal Stenosis, Low Back PainArmsStandard Movement Protocol, Accerelerometer Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic pain and neurogenic claudication related to lumbar spinal stenosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Prediction of walking ability following posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostic tests in the clinical diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: Consensus and Results of an International Delphi Study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlo AmmendoliaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, cammendolia@mtsinai.on.ca.
Kent Stuber
Christy Tomkins-Lane
Michael Schneider
Y Raja Rampersaud
Andrea D Furlan
Carol A Kennedy
University of Toronto · CACanadian Memorial Chiropractic College · CAMount Royal University · CAToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAToronto Western Hospital · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate what interventions can improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis.

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and ICL databases up to June 2012. Only randomized controlled trials published in English and measuring walking ability were included. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and quality of the evidence evaluation were performed using methods of the Cochrane Back Review Group.

resultsWe accepted 18 studies with 1,220 participants. There is very low quality evidence that calcitonin is no better than placebo or paracetamol regardless of mode of administration. There is low quality evidence that prostaglandins, and very low quality evidence that gabapentin or methylcobalamin, improves walking distance. There is low and very low quality evidence that physical therapy was no better in improving walking ability compared to no treatment, oral diclofenac plus home exercises, or combined manual therapy and exercise. There is very low quality evidence that epidural injections improve walking distance up to 2 weeks compared to placebo. There is low- and very low-quality evidence that various direct decompression surgical techniques show similar significant improvements in walking ability. There is low quality evidence that direct decompression is no better than non-operative treatment in improving walking ability. There is very low quality evidence that indirect decompression improves walking ability compared to non-operative treatment.

conclusionsCurrent evidence for surgical and non-surgical treatment to improve walking ability is of low and very low quality and thus prohibits recommendations to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAminesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcitoninCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDecompression, SurgicalDiclofenacGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansIntermittent ClaudicationLumbar VertebraePhysical Therapy ModalitiesProstaglandinsAcetaminophenAminesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcitoninCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDiclofenacGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidProstaglandins

Identifiers

PMID24633719
OpenAlexW1975292079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.