Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24633591›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2014

"We all talk about it as though we're thinking about the same thing." Healthcare professionals' goals in the management of pain due to advanced cancer: a qualitative study.

Rebecca Bhatia, Bhatia Rebecca, Jane Gibbins, Gibbins Jane, Karen Forbes, Forbes Karen, Colette Reid, Reid Colette

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The meaning of manageable neuropathic pain after SCI.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Oncologist's knowledge and implementation of guidelines for breakthrough cancer pain in Spain: CONOCE study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Rebecca, Bhatia [corrected to Bhatia, Rebecca]; Jane, Gibbins [corrected to Gibbins, Jane]; Karen, Forbes [corrected to Forbes, Karen]; Colette, Reid [corrected to Reid, Colette]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca Bhatia
Bhatia RebeccaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Elgar House, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK, rebeccabhatia@hotmail.com.
Jane Gibbins
Gibbins Jane
Karen Forbes
Forbes Karen
Colette Reid
Reid Colette
At Bristol · GBSouthmead Hospital · GBSt Christopher's Hospice · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnfortunately, several barriers impede successful management of cancer pain including those relating to the assessment and measurement of pain. There is currently no consensus as to what constitutes good pain control or what healthcare professionals are aiming to achieve in the management of pain for patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' views and experiences to elicit what they are aiming to achieve in managing pain for patients with advanced cancer.

methodsHealthcare professionals involved in the management of cancer pain were sampled purposively and interviewed using a semi-structured interview technique until saturation of data. Data were analysed using the constant comparison approach.

resultsSixteen interviews took place and four main themes emerged: aims of pain management, assessing response to pain management, managing expectations, and building relationships. Healthcare professionals found assessing patients' pain challenging and reported that patients had difficulty using numerical rating scales. Healthcare professionals used different terms when talking about managing pain, such as 'pain control' but found it difficult to define these terms. Maintaining patients' function and managing their expectations were described as important. However, it was not always clear whether the patient goals mentioned were voiced explicitly by the patient or assumed by the healthcare professional.

conclusionHealthcare professionals described what they deemed important in the management of pain. The goals they mentioned almost exclusively related to function as opposed to pain scores, but patients' goals and expectations were often not elicited specifically.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGoalsHealth PersonnelHumansNeoplasmsPainPain ManagementQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID24633591
OpenAlexW2061473065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.