Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24633400›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2015

Proteomic urinary biomarker approach in renal disease: from discovery to implementation.

Joost P Schanstra, Harald Mischak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pursuing Diabetic Nephropathy through Aqueous Humor Proteomics Analysis.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Urinary Peptidomic Biomarkers in Kidney Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The nephrologist of tomorrow: towards a kidney-omic future.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Urinary biomarkers for renal tract malformations.Expert review of proteomics · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joost P SchanstraInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Institut of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease, Toulouse, France.
Harald Mischak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers hold the promise of significantly improving health care by enabling prognosis and diagnosis with improved accuracy, and at earlier points in time. Previous results have indicated that single biomarkers are not suitable to describe complex diseases such as kidney disease. Here we provide an update on the progress of urinary proteomics-based studies and strategies to develop biomarker-based classifiers that tolerate instability and inconsistency of individual biomarkers. The examples focus on two major fields in nephrology: chronic kidney disease in the adult population and obstructive nephropathies in the pediatric population. When employed adequately, urinary proteomics demonstrates a clear value in kidney disease, indicating that the current status quo ruling for decades now could be changed by applying modern "omics" approaches. However, while research is able to deliver these useful tools for patient management, the issues associated with implementation are not yet solved. Active engagement of the relevant clinical professional societies, as well as patient's organizations, might help to implement these omics approaches that have shown a clear benefit for the patient.

Indexed as

ProteomicsBiomarkersHumansKidney DiseasesBiomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.