Trial reportHNO2014
[ENT surgery in patients with anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors].
Trial report in HNO, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Thromboelastography and Rotational Thromboelastometry in Otolaryngology: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- [Clinical management of epistaxis].HNO · 2019Article
- Outcome after pharyngeal reconstruction using pectoralis major and radial forearm flap after resection of pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016Article
- Hemostatic management of patients undergoing ear-nose-throat surgery.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy (AP/AT) represent a substantial proportion of ear, nose and throat (ENT) patients. Despite the ubiquitous consideration of bleeding and ischemic/thrombembolic risk, no detailed assessment of the perioperative setting in an ENT cohort is available in the literature.
objectivesThe goal of the present work is to give a detailed assessment of patients with AP/AT in an ENT cohort resulting in ENT-specific recommendations for daily routine. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn all, 400 randomized patients were asked regarding analgetic therapy in acute pain. Medical data of 5211 patients who underwent head and neck surgery were analyzed for AP/AT therapy. Therapeutic strategies, the perioperative AP/AT therapy, duration of intensive care treatment and hospitalization (ICT/H), application of erythrocytes and internistic/neurolocigal complication data were analyzed in patients with/without AP/AT.
resultsNearly 75 % of our patients were taking AP/AT due to coronary heart disease (CHD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), cardiac arrhythmia, or cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients' questionnaire revealed that 31 % of our patients use acetylsalicylic acid in acute pain, which represents 10 % of the overall AP/AT cohort. Head and neck surgery in patients with AP/AT showed an elevated bleeding frequency (p = 0.006) without an elevated risk for internistic/neurological complications. ICT/H were remarkably prolonged (p = 0.006; p = 0.0004). DISCUSSION: Head and neck surgery in patients with AP/AT can be routinely performed. Indication for intensive care, endotracheal intubation, and tracheostomy should be made generously due to high requirements of airway management in ENT. Ischemic/thrombembolic and bleeding risk requires careful assessment in an interdisciplinary setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.