Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24632862›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2014

Malignant epithelioid schwannoma of the oral cavity in a cat.

Hassadin Boonsriroj, Kazunori Kimitsuki, Tetsuya Akagi, Chun-Ho Park

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Focused ultrasound ablation of a large canine oral tumor achieves efficient tumor remission: a case report.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2021
    Article
  2. Malignant renal schwannoma in a cat.Open veterinary journal · 2017
    Article
  3. Subcutaneous rhabdomyosarcoma in an old rabbit.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hassadin BoonsrirojDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, 23-35-1, Higashi, Towada, Aomori 034-8628, Japan.
Kazunori Kimitsuki
Tetsuya Akagi
Chun-Ho Park
Kitasato University · JPFujita Animal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A malignant epithelioid schwannoma of the oral cavity was diagnosed in an 8-year-old domestic short-hair cat. The mass was located in the gingiva of the upper left premolar to molar region and showed multinodular growth patterns. The mass comprised epithelioid cells arranged in densely packed sheets. Tumor cells had large, round to oval nuclei with prominent nucleoli and an abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunohistochemically, most of the tumor cells were positive for S-100 protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin, but all lacked melanoma-associated antigen and muscle and neuroendocrine markers. Stains for type IV collagen showed linear immunoreactivity around single cells and groups of cells. Ultrastructurally, tumor cells were separated by a well-defined basement membrane, and interdigitating cell processes were observed. To our knowledge, this is the first report of feline malignant epithelioid schwannoma.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsEpithelioid CellsGingival NeoplasmsGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinImmunohistochemistryNeurilemmomaS100 ProteinsVimentinGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinS100 ProteinsVimentin

Identifiers

PMID24632862
PMCPMC4108782
OpenAlexW1975512987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.