Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24632820›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A microRNA signature associated with early recurrence in breast cancer.

Luis G Pérez-Rivas, José M Jerez, Rosario Carmona, Vanessa de Luque, Luis Vicioso, M Gonzalo Claros, Enrique Viguera, Bella Pajares, Alfonso Sánchez, Nuria Ribelles and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Silencing of miR-20b-5p Exerts Inhibitory Effect on Diabetic Retinopathy via Inactivation ofDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. MicroRNA heterogeneity in melanoma progression.Seminars in cancer biology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luis G Pérez-RivasLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
José M JerezDepartamento de Lenguajes y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Rosario CarmonaPlataforma Andaluza de Bioinformática, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Vanessa de LuqueLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Luis ViciosoServicio de Anatomía Patológica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
M Gonzalo ClarosPlataforma Andaluza de Bioinformática, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain; Departmento de Biología Molecular y Bioquímica, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Enrique VigueraDepartmento of Biología Celular, Genética y Fisiología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Bella PajaresLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Alfonso SánchezLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Nuria RibellesLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Emilio AlbaLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
José LozanoLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Málaga (IBIMA), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain; Departmento de Biología Molecular y Bioquímica, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent breast cancer occurring after the initial treatment is associated with poor outcome. A bimodal relapse pattern after surgery for primary tumor has been described with peaks of early and late recurrence occurring at about 2 and 5 years, respectively. Although several clinical and pathological features have been used to discriminate between low- and high-risk patients, the identification of molecular biomarkers with prognostic value remains an unmet need in the current management of breast cancer. Using microarray-based technology, we have performed a microRNA expression analysis in 71 primary breast tumors from patients that either remained disease-free at 5 years post-surgery (group A) or developed early (group B) or late (group C) recurrence. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of microRNA expression data segregated tumors in two groups, mainly corresponding to patients with early recurrence and those with no recurrence. Microarray data analysis and RT-qPCR validation led to the identification of a set of 5 microRNAs (the 5-miRNA signature) differentially expressed between these two groups: miR-149, miR-10a, miR-20b, miR-30a-3p and miR-342-5p. All five microRNAs were down-regulated in tumors from patients with early recurrence. We show here that the 5-miRNA signature defines a high-risk group of patients with shorter relapse-free survival and has predictive value to discriminate non-relapsing versus early-relapsing patients (AUC = 0.993, p-value<0.05). Network analysis based on miRNA-target interactions curated by public databases suggests that down-regulation of the 5-miRNA signature in the subset of early-relapsing tumors would result in an overall increased proliferative and angiogenic capacity. In summary, we have identified a set of recurrence-related microRNAs with potential prognostic value to identify patients who will likely develop metastasis early after primary breast surgery.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyHumansMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisROC CurveTime FactorsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID24632820
PMCPMC3954835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.