Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24632679›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2014

Can serial monitoring of serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Nitric Oxide (NO), and Angiotensin II (ANGII) levels have predictive role during Bevacizumab treatment?

Ahmet Taner Sümbül, Umut Dişel, Nurzen Sezgin, Ahmet Sezer, Fatih Köse, Ali Ayberk Beşen, Zehra Sümbül, Hüseyin Abalı, Özgür Özyılkan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Pro12Ala Polymorphism on Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmet Taner SümbülDepertment of Medical Oncology, Mustafa Kemal University Medical Faculty, Hatay, Turkey.
Umut DişelDepertment of Medical Oncology, Hatay Defne Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.
Nurzen SezginDepertment of Biochemistry, Başkent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Ahmet SezerDepertment of Medical Oncology, Başkent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Fatih KöseMedical Oncology, Başkent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Ali Ayberk BeşenDepertment of Medical Oncology, Başkent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Zehra SümbülDepertment of Cardiology, Hatay Antakya State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.
Hüseyin AbalıDepertment of Medical Oncology, Başkent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Özgür ÖzyılkanDepertment of Medical Oncology, Başkent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Başkent University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard treatment of colorectal cancer includes both cytostatic chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Bevacizumab, targeting the VEGF receptor, is one of the primary targeted therapies that achieve better response rate and survival rate as compared to combination chemotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, there is no established single marker that can be used as a predictive marker in bevacizumab therapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe enrolled 24 patients with the diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer in our study. During the study, 2 blood samples were drawn from patients before the first cycle and after the sixth cycle of bevacizumab therapy. Serum levels of VEGF, ANG II, and NO were recorded.

resultsWhile the change across VEGF levels was found to be a statistically significant decreasing trend (p=0.009), this decrease was not found to be correlated with treatment response and hypertension development. Additionally, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of NO and ANG II levels.

conclusionsThis study showed a significant decrease in serum VEGF, but failed to show a significant change in NO and ANG II levels during bevacizumab treatment. Although no significant correlation was found between the presence of hypertension and markers, most patients (83%) had an increase in their blood pressure. Our results suggest that dynamic monitoring of NO and ANG II, along with VEGF, may not be useful as predictive markers for bevacizumab treatment in colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicAdultAgedAngiotensin IIAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabColorectal NeoplasmsDemographyFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNitric OxidePrognosisVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiotensin IIAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabNitric OxideVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24632679
PMCPMC3962326
OpenAlexW2062883588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.