Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24631948›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2014

Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer.

F Collinson, W Qian, R Fossati, A Lissoni, C Williams, M Parmar, J Ledermann, N Colombo, A Swart, ICON1 collaborators

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Subcellular Stress Markers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Siglec-9Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023
    Article
  12. Exploiting a living biobank to delineate mechanisms underlying disease-specific chromosome instability.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Genomic Landscape of Early-Stage Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

F CollinsonClinical Trials Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds.
W QianCambridge Cancer Trials Centre/Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit Hub for Trials Methodology, Cambridge, UK.
R FossatiDepartment of Oncology, Mario Negri Institute, Milan.
A LissoniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, S. Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
C WilliamsDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Bristol, Bristol, Avon.
M ParmarMedical Research Unit Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London m.parmar@ucl.ac.uk.
J LedermannUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
N ColomboDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
A SwartNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, UK.
ICON1 collaborators
University College London · GBAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITMedical Research Council · GBMylan (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15953Medical Research Council MC_U122861379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no clear consensus regarding systemic treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer (OC). Clinical trials are challenging because of the relatively low incidence and good prognosis. Initial results of the International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm (ICON)1 trial demonstrated benefit in both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with adjuvant chemotherapy. We report results of 10-year follow-up to establish whether benefits are maintained longer term and discuss how this and other available evidence from randomised trials can be used to guide treatment options regarding the need for, and choice of, adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND

methodsICON1 recruited women with OC following primary surgery in whom there was uncertainty as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant or no adjuvant chemotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy was recommended and 87% received single-agent carboplatin. Analyses of long-term treatment benefits and interaction with risk groups were carried out. A high-risk group of women was defined with stage 1B/1C grade 2/3, any stage 1 grade 3 or clear-cell histology.

resultsWith a median follow-up of 10 years, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for RFS was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.94, P = 0.02] and OS 0.71 (95% CI 0.52-0.98, P = 0.04) in favour of chemotherapy. In absolute terms, there was a 10% (60%-70%) improvement in RFS and a 9% (64%-73%) improvement in OS; the benefit of chemotherapy might be greater in high-risk disease (18% improvement in OS). Uncertainty remains about the optimal chemotherapy regimen. The only randomised trial data available are from a subset of 120 stage 1 patients in ICON3 where the treatment difference, comparing carboplatin with carboplatin/paclitaxel was estimated with relatively wide CIs [progression-free survival HR = 0.71 (95% CI 0.39-1.32) and OS HR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.49-1.93)].

conclusionsExtended follow-up from ICON1 confirms that adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to women with early-stage OC, particularly those with high-risk disease. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: ISRCTN11916376 for ICON1 and ISRCTN57157825 for ICON3.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPlatinum CompoundsPlatinum Compoundsadjuvant chemotherapyearly-stage ovarian cancerICON1ICON3

Identifiers

PMID24631948
PMCPMC4037858
OpenAlexW2163983250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.