Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24631509›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2014

Additional value of transluminal attenuation gradient in CT angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis.

Wynand J Stuijfzand, Ibrahim Danad, Pieter G Raijmakers, C Bogdan Marcu, Martijn W Heymans, Cornelis C van Kuijk, Albert C van Rossum, Koen Nieman, James K Min, Jonathon Leipsic and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wynand J StuijfzandDepartment of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ibrahim DanadDepartment of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pieter G RaijmakersDepartment of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C Bogdan MarcuDepartment of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn W HeymansDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cornelis C van KuijkDepartment of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Albert C van RossumDepartment of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Koen NiemanDepartment of Cardiology and Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
James K MinInstitute for Cardiovascular Imaging, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Jonathon LeipsicDepartment of Medicine and Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Niels van RoyenDepartment of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Paul KnaapenDepartment of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: p.knaapen@vumc.nl.

Funding

Gender-Specific Coronary Plaque Characteristics and Risk of Myocardial InfarctionR01HL115150 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MIN, JAMES K · 2012 to 2016
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe current study evaluates the incremental value of transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG), TAG with corrected contrast opacification (CCO), and TAG with exclusion of calcified coronary segments (ExC) over coronary computed tomography angiogram (CTA) alone using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the gold standard.

backgroundTAG is defined as the contrast opacification gradient along the length of a coronary artery on a coronary CTA. Preliminary data suggest that TAG provides additional functional information. Interpretation of TAG is hampered by multiple heartbeat acquisition algorithms and coronary calcifications. Two correction models have been proposed based on either dephasing of contrast delivery by relating coronary density to corresponding descending aortic opacification (TAG-CCO) or excluding calcified coronary segments (TAG-ExC).

methodsEighty-five patients with intermediate probability of coronary artery disease were prospectively included. All patients underwent step-and-shoot 256-slice coronary CTA. TAG, TAG-CCO, and TAG-ExC analyses were performed followed by invasive coronary angiography in conjunction with FFR measurements of all major coronary branches.

resultsThirty-four patients (40%) were diagnosed with hemodynamically-significant coronary artery disease (i.e., FFR ≤0.80). On a per-vessel basis (n = 253), 59 lesions (23%) were graded as hemodynamically significant, and the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA (diameter stenosis ≥50%) was 95%, 75%, 98%, and 54% for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value, respectively. TAG and TAG-ExC did not discriminate between vessels with or without hemodynamically significant lesions (-13.5 ± 17.1 HU [Hounsfield units] × 10 mm(-1) vs. -11.6 ± 13.3 HU × 10 mm(-1), p = 0.36; and 13.1 ± 15.9 HU × 10 mm(-1) vs. -11.4 ± 11.7 HU × 10 mm(-1), p = 0.77, respectively). TAG-CCO was lower in vessels with a hemodynamically-significant lesion (-0.050 ± 0.051 10 mm(-1) vs. -0.036 ± 0.034 10 mm(-1), p = 0.03) and TAG-ExC resulted in a slight improvement of the net reclassification index (0.021, p < 0.05).

conclusionsTAG did not provide incremental diagnostic value over 256-slice coronary CTA alone in assessing the hemodynamic consequences of a coronary stenosis. Correction for temporal nonuniformity of contrast delivery or exclusion of calcified coronary segments slightly enhanced the results.

Indexed as

Fractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHemodynamicsMultidetector Computed TomographyAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness Indexcoronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomography angiographyfractional flow reserve

Identifiers

PMID24631509
PMCPMC4378651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.