Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24631296›Full record

ReviewPhysiology & behavior2014

Is fat taste ready for primetime?

Nicholas V DiPatrizio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology & behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Role of the Endocannabinoid System in Binge Eating Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. The Direct and Structure Effect of Income on Nutrition Demand of Chinese Rural Residents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacology of T2R Mediated Host-Microbe Interactions.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Preferences for Sweet and Fatty Taste in Children and Their Mothers in Association with Weight Status.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nicholas V DiPatrizioDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: ndipatri@uci.edu.

Funding

A Role for Endocannabinoids in the Control of Dietary Fat IntakeK99DA034009 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DIPATRIZIO, NICHOLAS VINCENT · 2013 to 2014
$253k
NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA034009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that gustation is important for the orosensory detection of dietary fats, and might contribute to preferences that humans, rodents, and possibly other mammals exhibit for fat-rich foods. In contrast to sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami, fat is not widely recognized as a primary taste quality. Recent investigations, however, provide a wealth of information that is helping to elucidate the specific molecular, cellular, and neural mechanisms required for fat detection in mammals. The latest evidence supporting a fat taste will be explored in this review, with a particular focus on recent studies that suggest a surprising role for gut-brain endocannabinoid signaling in controlling intake and preference for fats based on their proposed taste properties.

Indexed as

FatsFood PreferencesAnimalsEndocannabinoidsFastingHumansRewardTasteEndocannabinoidsFatsEndocannabinoidFatFood rewardPeripheryTaste

Identifiers

PMID24631296
PMCPMC4162865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.