Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24631001›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2014

General and substance-specific predictors of young adult nicotine dependence, alcohol use disorder, and problem behavior: replication in two samples.

J A Bailey, D R Samek, M A Keyes, K G Hill, B M Hicks, M McGue, W G Iacono, M Epstein, R F Catalano, K P Haggerty and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. General and Specific Predictors of Comorbid Substance Use and Internalizing Problems from Adolescence to Age 33.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Article
  9. The Role of Emotional Abuse in Youth Smoking.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J A BaileySocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Avenue NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, United States. Electronic address: jabailey@uw.edu.
D R SamekDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
M A KeyesDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
K G HillSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Avenue NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, United States.
B M HicksDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
M McGueDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
W G IaconoDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
M EpsteinSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Avenue NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, United States.
R F CatalanoSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Avenue NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, United States.
K P HaggertySocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Avenue NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, United States.
J D HawkinsSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Avenue NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, United States.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

REDUCING RISK &ENHANCING PROTECTIVE FACTORS IN CHILDRENR01DA008093 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CATALANO, RICHARD F · 1993 to 2010
$12.4M
Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TOLNAY, STEWART E · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
TWIN STUDY OF FEMALE ALCOHOLISMS AND OTHER DISORDERSR01AA009367 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MCGUE, MATTHEW K. · 1992 to 2013
$9.0M
Gene-Environment Interplay in the Development of Drug Abuse, HIV Sexual Risk BehaR01DA024411 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HILL, KARL GORDON · 2009 to 2015
$7.7M
Twin Family Study of Vulnerability to Substance AbuseR37DA005147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G. · 2009 to 2018
$6.4M
SUBSTANCE USE AND TRANSITIONS TO ADULT ROLESR01DA009679 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAWKINS, J DAVID · 1996 to 2008
$6.1M
TWIN/FAMILY STUDY OF VULNERABILITY TO SUBSTANCE ABUSER01DA005147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G · 1987 to 2007
$5.5M
Adolescent drinking and midlife outcomes: A prospective cotwin control studyR37AA009367 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MCGUE, MATTHEW K. · 2016 to 2024
$5.4M
RESEARCH IN PSYCHOPATHOLOGYT32MH017069 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LUCIANA, MONICA · 1985 to 2011
$2.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA09367NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA009367NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA009367NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828NIDA NIH HHS DA008093NIDA NIH HHS DA009679NIDA NIH HHS DA024411NIDA NIH HHS DA05147NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA005147NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA008093NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009679NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024411NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA005147NIMH NIH HHS MH017069NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH017069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper presents two replications of a heuristic model for measuring environment in studies of gene-environment interplay in the etiology of young adult problem behaviors.

methodsData were drawn from two longitudinal, U.S. studies of the etiology of substance use and related behaviors: the Raising Healthy Children study (RHC; N=1040, 47% female) and the Minnesota Twin Family Study (MTFS; N=1512, 50% female). RHC included a Pacific Northwest, school-based, community sample. MTFS included twins identified from state birth records in Minnesota. Both studies included commensurate measures of general family environment and family substance-specific environments in adolescence (RHC ages 10-18; MTFS age 18), as well as young adult nicotine dependence, alcohol and illicit drug use disorders, HIV sexual risk behavior, and antisocial behavior (RHC ages 24, 25; MTFS age 25).

resultsResults from the two samples were highly consistent and largely supported the heuristic model proposed by Bailey et al. (2011). Adolescent general family environment, family smoking environment, and family drinking environment predicted shared variance in problem behaviors in young adulthood. Family smoking environment predicted unique variance in young adult nicotine dependence. Family drinking environment did not appear to predict unique variance in young adult alcohol use disorder.

conclusionsOrganizing environmental predictors and outcomes into general and substance-specific measures provides a useful way forward in modeling complex environments and phenotypes. Results suggest that programs aimed at preventing young adult problem behaviors should target general family environment and family smoking and drinking environments in adolescence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlcohol-Related DisordersAntisocial Personality DisorderChildFamily HealthFemaleHumansMaleMinnesotaNorthwestern United StatesRisk FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersTobacco Use DisorderTwinsUnsafe SexAlcohol misuseMeasuring environment for GxENicotine dependenceProblem behaviorReplication

Identifiers

PMID24631001
PMCPMC4000557
OpenAlexW2002290360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.