Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24630845›Full record

ReviewTrends in plant science2014

Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms.

Ulrich Deinlein, Aaron B Stephan, Tomoaki Horie, Wei Luo, Guohua Xu, Julian I Schroeder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 649 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
649citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

649 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Assembly of Alginate-Chitosan-Xanthine Hydrogel andMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. The CaThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

589 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulrich DeinleinDivision of Biological Sciences, Food and Fuel for the 21st Century Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA.
Aaron B StephanDivision of Biological Sciences, Food and Fuel for the 21st Century Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA.
Tomoaki HorieDivision of Applied Biology, Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano 386-8567, Japan.
Wei LuoDivision of Biological Sciences, Food and Fuel for the 21st Century Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA; State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, MOA Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization in Lower-Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Guohua XuState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, MOA Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization in Lower-Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Julian I SchroederDivision of Biological Sciences, Food and Fuel for the 21st Century Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA. Electronic address: jischroeder@ucsd.edu.

Funding

Yeast Genetics and Stress Response Genes-BiomedicalP42ES010337 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TUKEY, ROBERT H · 2000 to 2022
$69.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop performance is severely affected by high salt concentrations in soils. To engineer more salt-tolerant plants it is crucial to unravel the key components of the plant salt-tolerance network. Here we review our understanding of the core salt-tolerance mechanisms in plants. Recent studies have shown that stress sensing and signaling components can play important roles in regulating the plant salinity stress response. We also review key Na+ transport and detoxification pathways and the impact of epigenetic chromatin modifications on salinity tolerance. In addition, we discuss the progress that has been made towards engineering salt tolerance in crops, including marker-assisted selection and gene stacking techniques. We also identify key open questions that remain to be addressed in the future.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant Physiological PhenomenaSalt ToleranceCrops, AgriculturalPlantsPlants, Genetically ModifiedSodium ChlorideStress, PhysiologicalSodium Chlorideabiotic stressbiotechnologyengineering of salt-tolerant plantsNaClplant salinity tolerance

Identifiers

PMID24630845
PMCPMC4041829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.