Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24630736›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2014

A CULLINary ride across the secretory pathway: more than just secretion.

Albert Lu, Suzanne R Pfeffer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The role of cullin proteins in gastric cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Albert LuDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5307, USA. Electronic address: alulopez@stanford.edu.
Suzanne R PfefferDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5307, USA. Electronic address: pfeffer@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

INTRACELLULAR TRANSPORT--THE MANNOSE/PHOSPHATE RECEPTORR01DK037332 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PFEFFER, SUZANNE R · 1986 to 2019
$4.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK037332PHS HHS 37332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mulitmeric cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) represent the largest class of ubiquitin ligases in eukaryotes. However, most CRL ubiquitylation pathways remain uncharacterized. CRLs control a myriad of functions by catalyzing mono- or poly-ubiquitylation of target proteins. Recently, novel CRLs have been identified along the secretory pathway where they modify substrates involved in diverse cellular processes such as vesicle coat assembly and cell cycle progression. This review discusses our current understanding of CRL ubiquitylation within the secretory pathway, with special emphasis on the emerging role of the Golgi as a ubiquitylation platform. CRLs are also implicated in endosome function, where their specific roles are less well understood.

Indexed as

AnimalsCullin ProteinsEndosomesGolgi ApparatusHumansProtein TransportSecretory PathwayUbiquitinationUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCullin ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligasescullin proteinscullin-RING ligasesGolgi complexpost-translational modificationubiquitylation

Identifiers

PMID24630736
PMCPMC4074570
OpenAlexW2022612358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.