Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24630527›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2014

Ordering microbial diversity into ecologically and genetically cohesive units.

B Jesse Shapiro, Martin F Polz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hidden diversity inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  12. The ecology and evolution of microbial immune systems: a look on the wild vibrio side.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Exploring Mobile Genetic Elements in Vibrio cholerae.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The evolutionary genomics of adaptation to stress in wild rhizobium bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

B Jesse ShapiroDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada. Electronic address: jesse.shapiro@umontreal.ca.
Martin F PolzParsons Laboratory for Environmental Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: mpolz@mit.edu.

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LEVINE, STUART S · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109NIEHS NIH HHS P30-ES002109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose that microbial diversity must be viewed in light of gene flow and selection, which define units of genetic similarity, and of phenotype and ecological function, respectively. We discuss to what extent ecological and genetic units overlap to form cohesive populations in the wild, based on recent evolutionary modeling and on evidence from some of the first microbial populations studied with genomics. These show that if recombination is frequent and selection moderate, ecologically adaptive mutations or genes can spread within populations independently of their original genomic background (gene-specific sweeps). Alternatively, if the effect of recombination is smaller than selection, genome-wide selective sweeps should occur. In both cases, however, distinct units of overlapping ecological and genotypic similarity will form if microgeographic separation, likely involving ecological tradeoffs, induces barriers to gene flow. These predictions are supported by (meta)genomic data, which suggest that a 'reverse ecology' approach, in which genomic and gene flow information is used to make predictions about the nature of ecological units, is a powerful approach to ordering microbial diversity.

Indexed as

BiotaGenetic VariationGene Transfer, HorizontalMutationPhylogeographyRecombination, GeneticSelection, Geneticecological differentiationgene flowmosaic sympatric speciationpopulation genomicsreverse ecologyselective sweeps

Identifiers

PMID24630527
PMCPMC4103024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.