Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24629994›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2014

Efficacy of a monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Nita Bhandari, Temsunaro Rongsen-Chandola, Ashish Bavdekar, Jacob John, Kalpana Antony, Sunita Taneja, Nidhi Goyal, Anand Kawade, Gagandeep Kang, Sudeep Singh Rathore and 19 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 176 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01305109 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Protective Efficacy of Three Doses of Oral Rotavirus Vaccine (ORV) 116E, Against Severe Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorBharat Biotech International LimitedRan2011 to 2014Enrolled6,800ConditionsViral Gastroenteritis Due to RotavirusArmsORV 116E, Placebo
NCT03602053 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Single Centre, Phase IIb Study to Assess the Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity and Safety of Three Live Oral Rotavirus Vaccines, ROTAVAC® , ROTAVAC 5CM and Rotarix® in Healthy Zambian Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaRan2019 to 2019Enrolled450ConditionsDiarrhea, Diarrhea RotavirusArmsROTAVAC®, ROTAVAC 5D, Rotarix®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  8. Systematic review of the economic value of diarrheal vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Nita BhandariCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Temsunaro Rongsen-ChandolaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Ashish BavdekarKEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Jacob JohnChristian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kalpana AntonyPATH, New Delhi, India.
Sunita TanejaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Nidhi GoyalCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Anand KawadeKEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Gagandeep KangChristian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sudeep Singh RathoreCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Sanjay JuvekarKEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Jayaprakash MuliyilChristian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Alok AryaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Hanif ShaikhKEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Vinod AbrahamChristian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sudhanshu VratiTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Michael ProschanNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Robert KohbergerBlair & Co, Greenwich, CT, USA.
Georges ThiryAdvancing Rotavirus Vaccines Development Project, PATH, France.
Roger GlassNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Harry B GreenbergStanford University School of Medicine, USA.
George CurlinNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Krishna MohanBharat Biotech International, Genome Valley, Andhra Pradesh, India.
G V J A HarshavardhanBharat Biotech International, Genome Valley, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sai PrasadBharat Biotech International, Genome Valley, Andhra Pradesh, India.
T S RaoDepartment of Biotechnology, Government of India, India.
John BoslegoVaccine Development Global Program, PATH, USA.
Maharaj Kishan BhanMinistry of Science and Technology, Government of India, India. Electronic address: rajkbhan@gmail.com.
India Rotavirus Vaccine Group
Society for Applied Studies · INChristian Medical College & Hospital · INBharat Biotech (India) · INNational Institutes of Health · USGovernment of India · INMinistry of Science and Technology · INProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · INProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USStanford University · USTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute · IN

Funding

INDO-US Collaboration to Develop Rotavirus VaccinesU01AI053719 · NIAID · ALL-INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES · PI RAY, PRATIMA · 2003 to 2005
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI053719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRotavirus is the most common cause of severe dehydrating gastroenteritis in developing countries. Safe, effective, and affordable rotavirus vaccines are needed in these countries. We aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a monovalent human-bovine rotavirus vaccine for severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in low-resource urban and rural settings in India.

methodsWe did a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial at three sites in Delhi (urban), Pune (rural), and Vellore (urban and rural) between March 11, 2011, and Nov 5, 2012. Infants aged 6-7 weeks were randomly assigned (2:1), via a central interactive voice or web response system with a block size of 12, to receive either three doses of oral human-bovine natural reassortant vaccine (116E) or placebo at ages 6-7 weeks, 10 weeks, and 14 weeks. Infants' families, study investigators, paediatricians in referral hospitals, laboratory staff, and committee members were all masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was incidence of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (≥11 on the Vesikari scale). Efficacy outcomes and adverse events were ascertained through active surveillance. Analysis was by intention to treat and per protocol. The trial is registered with Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI/2010/091/000102) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01305109).

findings4532 infants were assigned to receive the 116E vaccine and 2267 to receive placebo, of whom 4354 (96%) and 2187 (96%) infants, respectively, were included in the primary per-protocol efficacy analysis. 71 events of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis were reported in 4752 person-years in infants in the vaccine group compared with 76 events in 2360 person-years in those in the placebo group; vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 53·6% (95% CI 35·0-66·9; p=0·0013) and 56·4% (36·6-70·1; p<0·0001) in the first year of life. The number of infants needed to be immunised to prevent one severe rotavirus gastroenteritis episode was 55 (95% CI 37-97). The incidence of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis per 100 person-years was 1·5 in the vaccine group and 3·2 in the placebo group, with an incidence rate ratio of 0·46 (95% CI 0·33-0·65). Prevalence of immediate, solicited, and serious adverse events was similar in both groups. One case of urticaria in the vaccine group and one each of acute gastroenteritis and suspected sepsis in the placebo group were regarded as related to the study product. We recorded six cases of intussusception in the vaccine group and two in the placebo group, all of which happened after the third dose. 25 (<1%) infants in the vaccine group and 17 (<1%) in the placebo group died; no death was regarded as related to the study product.

interpretationMonovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine is effective and well tolerated in Indian infants.

fundingDepartment of Biotechnology and the Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council, Government of India; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to PATH, USA; Research Council of Norway; UK Department for International Development; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA; and Bharat Biotech International, Hyderabad, India.

Indexed as

Double-Blind MethodFemaleGastroenteritisHumansIndiaInfantMaleRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24629994
PMCPMC4532697
OpenAlexW2101380815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.