Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24629165›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2014

Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level.

Olga Gorlova, Alexey Fedorov, Christopher Logothetis, Christopher Amos, Ivan Gorlov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identification of theBiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potential Influence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome-wide identification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification and expression analysis ofPlant signaling & behavior · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga Gorlova
Alexey Fedorov
Christopher Logothetis
Christopher Amos
Ivan GorlovDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon 03766, NH, USA. ivan.p.gorlov@dartmouth.edu.
Dartmouth College · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
A genomewide study of lung cancer in never smokersR01CA149462 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GORLOVA, OLGA · 2010 to 2014
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS 5 R01 CA149462NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe existence of introns in eukaryotic genes is believed to provide an evolutionary advantage by increasing protein diversity through exon shuffling and alternative splicing. However, this eukaryotic feature is associated with the necessity of exclusion of intronic sequences, which requires considerable energy expenditure and can lead to splicing errors. The relationship between intronic burden and evolution is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to analyze the relationship between the intronic burden and the level of evolutionary conservation of the gene.

resultsWe found a positive correlation between the level of evolutionary conservation of a gene and its intronic burden. The level of evolutionary conservation was estimated using the conservation index (CI). The CI value was determined on the basis of the most distant ortholog of the human protein sequence and ranged from 0 (the gene was unique to the human genome) to 9 (an ortholog of the human gene was detected in plants). In multivariable model, both the number of introns and total intron size remained significant predictors of CI. We also found that the number of alternative splice variants was positively correlated with CI.The expression level of a gene was negatively correlated with the number of introns and total size of intronic region. Genes with a greater intronic burden had lower density of missense and nonsense mutations in the coding regions of the gene, which suggests that they are under a stronger pressure from purifying selection.

conclusionsWe identified a positive association between intronic burden and CI. One of the possible explanations of this is the idea of a cost-benefits balance. Evolutionarily conserved (functionally important) genes can "afford" the negative consequences of maintaining multiple introns because these consequences are outweighed by the benefit of maintaining the gene. Evolutionarily conserved and functionally important genes may use introns to create novel splice variants to tune the gene function to developmental stage and tissue type.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, HumanIntronsBiological EvolutionExonsHumansRNA Splicing

Identifiers

PMID24629165
PMCPMC3995522
OpenAlexW2029115887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.