Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24628920›Full record

ArticleVascular cell2014

Embryonic rat vascular smooth muscle cells revisited - a model for neonatal, neointimal SMC or differentiated vascular stem cells?

Eimear Kennedy, Roya Hakimjavadi, Chris Greene, Ciaran J Mooney, Emma Fitzpatrick, Laura E Collins, Christine E Loscher, Shaunta Guha, David Morrow, Eileen M Redmond and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vascular cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Smooth muscle contractile cytoskeleton in health and disease.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Matters of the heart: Cellular sex differences.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hedgehog and Resident Vascular Stem Cell Fate.Stem cells international · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eimear Kennedy
Roya Hakimjavadi
Chris Greene
Ciaran J Mooney
Emma Fitzpatrick
Laura E Collins
Christine E Loscher
Shaunta Guha
David Morrow
Eileen M Redmond
Paul A CahillVascular Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, School of Biotechnology Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland. paul.cahill@dcu.ie.
Dublin City University · IEUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Pulsatile Flow Regulation of Vascular Cell FateR00HL095650 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MORROW, DAVID JOHN · 2011 to 2013
$735k
Role of Nogo-B in Mediating the Vascular Effects of AlcoholR21AA020365 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI REDMOND, EILEEN M. · 2012 to 2013
$386k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL095650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe A10 and A7r5 cell lines derived from the thoracic aorta of embryonic rat are widely used as models of non-differentiated, neonatal and neointimal vascular smooth muscle cells in culture. The recent discovery of resident multipotent vascular stem cells within the vessel wall has necessitated the identity and origin of these vascular cells be revisited. In this context, we examined A10 and A7r5 cell lines to establish the similarities and differences between these cell lines and multipotent vascular stem cells isolated from adult rat aortas by determining their differentiation state, stem cell marker expression and their multipotency potential in vitro.

methodsVascular smooth muscle cell differentiation markers (alpha-actin, myosin heavy chain, calponin) and stem cell marker expression (Sox10, Sox17 and S100β) were assessed using immunocytochemistry, confocal microscopy, FACS analysis and real-time quantitative PCR.

resultsBoth A10 and A7r5 expressed vascular smooth muscle differentiation, markers, smooth muscle alpha - actin, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain and calponin. In parallel analysis, multipotent vascular stem cells isolated from rat aortic explants were immunocytochemically myosin heavy chain negative but positive for the neural stem cell markers Sox10+, a neural crest marker, Sox17+ the endoderm marker, and the glia marker, S100β+. This multipotent vascular stem cell marker profile was detected in both embryonic vascular cell lines in addition to the adventitial progenitor stem cell marker, stem cell antigen-1, Sca1+. Serum deprivation resulted in a significant increase in stem cell and smooth muscle cell differentiation marker expression, when compared to serum treated cells. Both cell types exhibited weak multipotency following adipocyte inductive stimulation. Moreover, Notch signaling blockade following γ-secretase inhibition with DAPT enhanced the expression of both vascular smooth muscle and stem cell markers.

conclusionsWe conclude that A10 and A7r5 cells share similar neural stem cell markers to both multipotent vascular stem cells and adventitial progenitors that are indicative of neointimal stem-derived smooth muscle cells. This may have important implications for their use in examining vascular contractile and proliferative phenotypes in vitro.

Identifiers

PMID24628920
PMCPMC3995523
OpenAlexW2159794337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.