ArticleBMC health services research2014
Performance evaluation of a health insurance in Nigeria using optimal resource use: health care providers perspectives.
Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Charting the path to the implementation of universal health coverage policy in Nigeria through the lens of Delphi methodology.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Preferences of healthcare workers for provider payment systems in The Gambia's National Health Insurance Scheme.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Exploring the roles of players in strategic purchasing for healthcare in Africa-a scoping review.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- The Impact of COVID-19 on the Performance of Primary Health Care Service Providers in a Capitation Payment System: A Case Study from Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Access to care for childhood cancers in India: perspectives of health care providers and the implications for universal health coverage.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Evidence from the Kaduna State Health Accounts on the pattern of sub-national health spending in Nigeria, 2016.BMJ global health · 2020Article
- Attribute development and level selection for a discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of health care providers for capitation payment mechanism in Kenya.Health economics review · 2019Article
- Exploring effectiveness of different health financing mechanisms in Nigeria; what needs to change and how can it happen?BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Health care purchasing in Kenya: Experiences of health care providers with capitation and fee-for-service provider payment mechanisms.The International journal of health planning and management · 2019Article
- What characteristics of provider payment mechanisms influence health care providers' behaviour? A literature review.The International journal of health planning and management · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerformance measures are often neglected during the transition period of national health insurance scheme implementation in many low and middle income countries. These measurements evaluate the extent to which various aspects of the schemes meet their key objectives. This study assesses the implementation of a health insurance scheme using optimal resource use domains and examines possible factors that influence each domain, according to providers' perspectives.
methodsA retrospective, cross-sectional survey was done between August and December 2010 in Kaduna state, and 466 health care provider personnel were interviewed. Optimal-resource-use was defined in four domains: provider payment mechanism (capitation and fee-for-service payment methods), benefit package, administrative efficiency, and active monitoring mechanism. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify provider factors that may influence each domain.
resultsIn the provider payment mechanism domain, capitation payment method (95%) performed better than fee-for-service payment method (62%). Benefit package domain performed strongly (97%), while active monitoring mechanism performed weakly (37%). In the administrative efficiency domain, both promptness of referral system (80%) and prompt arrival of funds (93%) performed well. At the individual level, providers with fewer enrolees encountered difficulties with reimbursement. Other factors significantly influenced each of the optimal-resource-use domains.
conclusionsFee-for-service payment method and claims review, in the provider payment and active monitoring mechanisms, respectively, performed weakly according to the providers' (at individual-level) perspectives. A short-fall on the supply-side of health insurance could lead to a direct or indirect adverse effect on the demand-side of the scheme. Capitation payment per enrolees should be revised to conform to economic circumstances. Performance indicators and providers' characteristics and experiences associated with resource use can assist policy makers to monitor and evaluate health insurance implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.