Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24628887›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2014

Isolation of a Campylobacter lanienae-like bacterium from laboratory chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger).

E E Turowski, Z Shen, R M Ducore, N M A Parry, A Kirega, F E Dewhirst, J G Fox

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. A Systematic Review on the Role of Wildlife as Carriers and Spreaders ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pathogenomics of EmergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. First reported case ofJMM case reports · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

E E TurowskiDivision of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Z Shen
R M Ducore
N M A Parry
A Kirega
F E Dewhirst
J G Fox
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USForsyth County Schools · USHarvard University · USOregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LEVINE, STUART S · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
Biomedical Research Training for Veterinary ScientistsT32OD010978 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FOX, JAMES G · 2012 to 2017
$2.2M
Diagnosis and Pathobiology of Emerging Enterohepatic Helicobacter spp. in MiceR01OD011141 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FOX, JAMES G · 2012 to 2014
$1.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109NIEHS NIH HHS P30-ES02109NIH HHS R01 OD011141NIH HHS R01-OD011141NIH HHS T32-OD007036NIH HHS T32 OD010978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routine necropsies of 27 asymptomatic juvenile chinchillas revealed a high prevalence of gastric ulcers with microscopic lymphoplasmacytic gastroenteritis and typhlocolitis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using Campylobacter genus-specific partial 16S rRNA primers revealed the presence of Campylobacter spp. DNA in the faeces of 12 of 27 animals (44.4%). Species-specific partial 16S rRNA PCR and sequencing confirmed that these animals were colonized with Campylobacter lanienae, a gram-negative, microaerophilic bacterium that was first identified on routine faecal screening of slaughterhouse employees and subsequently isolated from faeces of livestock. Campylobacter lanienae was isolated from the faeces of six PCR-positive animals and identified with species-specific PCR and full 16S rRNA sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis showed that these isolates clustered with C. lanienae strain NCTC 13004. PCR analysis of DNA extracted from gastrointestinal tissues revealed the presence of C. lanienae DNA in the caecum and colon of these chinchillas. Gastrointestinal lesions were scored and compared between C. lanienae-positive and C. lanienae-negative animals. There was no correlation between colonization status and lesion severity in the stomach, liver, duodenum, or colon. Possible routes of C. lanienae infection in chinchillas could include waterborne transmission and faecal-oral transmission from wild mice and rats or livestock. Based on these findings, the authors conclude that C. lanienae colonizes the lower bowel of chinchillas in the absence of clinical disease. This is the first report of C. lanienae in any rodent species. Campylobacter lanienae isolates from different mammalian species demonstrate heterogeneity by 16S rRNA sequence comparison. Analysis using rpoB suggests that isolates and clones currently identified as C. lanienae may represent multiple species or subspecies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsChinchillaDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalFecesGastroenteritisMaleModels, AnimalMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal16S ribosomal RNACampylobacter lanienaechinchillaDNA sequence analysisrpoB

Identifiers

PMID24628887
PMCPMC4163145
OpenAlexW2077485501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.