ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2014
Considerations for recommending extended use and limited reuse of filtering facepiece respirators in health care settings.
Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Microwave- and heat-based decontamination of N95 filtering facepiece respirators: a systematic review.The Journal of hospital infection · 2020Pooled it
- Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: rapid guidelines.Intensive care medicine · 2020Guideline
- Guidelines for Frontline Health Care Staff Safety for COVID-19.Journal of primary care & community healthGuideline
- Stable Solid Peracetic Acid Precursor for Effective Decontamination and Reuse of Personal Protective Equipment.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Nursing perception and practices in N95 mask reuse in intensive care: a cross-sectional study.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator Reuse, Extended Use, and Filtration Efficiency.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional study of personal protective equipment use, training and biosafety preparedness among healthcare workers during the first months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Brazil.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Incidence of Fit Test Failure During N95 Respirator Reuse and Extended Use.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Perioperative provider safety in the pandemic: Development, implementation and evaluation of an adjunct COVID-19 Surgical Patient Checklist.Anaesthesia and intensive care · 2022Article
- Infection Prevention and Control of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Health Care Settings.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Comparison of filtration efficiency and respiratory resistance of COVID-19 protective masks by multi-national standards.American journal of infection control · 2022Article
- One for Everyone: A Study of User Satisfaction Among Health-Care Providers Regarding Extended Use of N95 Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2022Article
- Evaluating fomite risk of brown paper bags storing personal protective equipment exposed to SARS-CoV-2: A quasi-experimental study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Decontamination of High-Efficiency Mask Filters From Respiratory Pathogens Including SARS-CoV-2 by Non-thermal Plasma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Impact on the fitness of N95 masks with extended use/limited reuse and dry heat decontamination.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2022Article
- Persistence of SARS-Co-V-2 on N95 filtering facepiece respirators: implications for reuse.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2021Article
- Availability and use of personal protective equipment and satisfaction of healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021Article
- Retina in the Age of COVID-19.Advances in ophthalmology and optometry · 2021Review
- Article
- In-House Filtration Efficiency Assessment of Vapor Hydrogen Peroxide Decontaminated Filtering Facepiece Respirators (FFRs).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Public health organizations, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are increasingly recommending the use of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) in health care settings. For infection control purposes, the usual practice is to discard FFRs after close contact with a patient ("single use"). However, in some situations, such as during contact with tuberculosis patients, limited FFR reuse (i.e., repeated donning and doffing of the same FFR by the same person) is practiced. A related practice, extended use, involves wearing the same FFR for multiple patient encounters without doffing. Extended use and limited FFR reuse have been recommended during infectious disease outbreaks and pandemics to conserve FFR supplies. This commentary examines CDC recommendations related to FFR extended use and limited reuse and analyzes available data from the literature to provide a relative estimate of the risks of these practices compared to single use. Analysis of the available data and the use of disease transmission models indicate that decisions regarding whether FFR extended use or reuse should be recommended should continue to be pathogen- and event-specific. Factors to be included in developing the recommendations are the potential for the pathogen to spread via contact transmission, the potential that the event could result in or is currently causing a FFR shortage, the protection provided by FFR use, human factors, potential for self-inoculation, the potential for secondary exposures, and government policies and regulations. While recent findings largely support the previous recommendations for extended use and limited reuse in certain situations, some new cautions and limitations should be considered before issuing recommendations in the future. In general, extended use of FFRs is preferred over limited FFR reuse. Limited FFR reuse would allow the user a brief respite from extended wear times, but increases the risk of self-inoculation and preliminary data from one study suggest that some FFR models may begin to lose effectiveness after multiple donnings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.