Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24628114›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2014

Interactions of antagonists with subtypes of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor.

Huma Saleem, Stephen C Tovey, Tedeusz F Molinski, Colin W Taylor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guidelines for evaluating endothelial function in vascular tissue.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Pacemaking in the lymphatic system.The Journal of physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spontaneous glutamate release activates mGluR signaling to drive rapid antidepressant responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Locusts adopt IPScience advances · 2025
    Article
  7. From IP3RPEP6 Inhibition of IPCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Regulation of BCR-mediated CaScience immunology · 2024
    Article
  13. CaPhysiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Neuropathic pain: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  18. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in cardiomyocyte physiology and disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. CaPhysiological reports · 2022
    Article
  20. CaCell calcium · 2022
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Huma SaleemDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Stephen C Tovey
Tedeusz F Molinski
Colin W Taylor
Bridge University · SSUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009736Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009736/1Wellcome Trust 101844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeInositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3 Rs) are intracellular Ca(2+) channels. Interactions of the commonly used antagonists of IP3Rs with IP3R subtypes are poorly understood. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: IP3-evoked Ca(2+) release from permeabilized DT40 cells stably expressing single subtypes of mammalian IP3R was measured using a luminal Ca(2+) indicator. The effects of commonly used antagonists on IP3-evoked Ca(2+) release and (3) H-IP3 binding were characterized. KEY

resultsFunctional analyses showed that heparin was a competitive antagonist of all IP3R subtypes with different affinities for each (IP3R3 > IP3R1 ≥ IP3R2). This sequence did not match the affinities for heparin binding to the isolated N-terminal from each IP3R subtype. 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB) and high concentrations of caffeine selectively inhibited IP3R1 without affecting IP3 binding. Neither Xestospongin C nor Xestospongin D effectively inhibited IP3-evoked Ca(2+) release via any IP3R subtype. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Heparin competes with IP3, but its access to the IP3-binding core is substantially hindered by additional IP3R residues. These interactions may contribute to its modest selectivity for IP3R3. Practicable concentrations of caffeine and 2-APB inhibit only IP3R1. Xestospongins do not appear to be effective antagonists of IP3Rs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBoron CompoundsCaffeineCalciumCell LineChickensHeparinInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsMacrocyclic CompoundsOxazoles2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borateBoron CompoundsCaffeineCalciumHeparinInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsMacrocyclic CompoundsOxazolesxestospongin Cxestospongin D2-APBantagonistCa2+ signalcaffeineDT40 cellheparininositol 1,4,5-trisphosphateIP3 receptorstructure-activity relationshipXestospongin

Identifiers

PMID24628114
PMCPMC4080982
OpenAlexW1494420910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.