Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24627782›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2013

Microbiopsy engineered for minimally invasive and suture-free sub-millimetre skin sampling.

Lynlee L Lin, Tarl W Prow, Anthony P Raphael, Robert L Harrold Iii, Clare A Primiero, Alexander B Ansaldo, H Peter Soyer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06178666 (A Feasibility Study of a Controlled Human Infection Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06178666 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Feasibility Study of a Controlled Human Infection Model (CHIM) With Intradermal Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Injection in Malawi

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineRan2024 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsTuberculosisArmsBCG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Microcore Skin Biopsies: A Novel, Micro-Invasive Skin Biopsy Technique Yielding Full-Thickness Histology.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Tissue harvest with a laser microbiopsy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AssessingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lynlee L LinDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4012, Australia.
Tarl W ProwDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4012, Australia.
Anthony P RaphaelDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4012, Australia.
Robert L Harrold IiiDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4012, Australia.
Clare A PrimieroDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4012, Australia.
Alexander B AnsaldoDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4012, Australia.
H Peter SoyerDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4012, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the development of a sub-millimetre skin punch biopsy device for minimally invasive and suture-free skin sampling for molecular diagnosis and research. Conventional skin punch biopsies range from 2-4 mm in diameter. Local anaesthesia is required and sutures are usually used to close the wound. Our microbiopsy is 0.50 mm wide and 0.20 mm thick. The microbiopsy device is fabricated from three stacked medical grade stainless steel plates tapered to a point and contains a chamber within the centre plate to collect the skin sample. We observed that the application of this device resulted in a 0.21 ± 0.04 mm wide puncture site in volunteer skin using reflectance confocal microscopy. Histological sections from microbiopsied skin revealed 0.22 ± 0.12 mm wide and 0.26 ± 0.09 mm deep puncture sites. Longitudinal observation in microbiopsied volunteers showed that the wound closed within 1 day and was not visible after 7 days. Reflectance confocal microscope images from these same sites showed the formation of a tiny crust that resolved by 3 weeks and was completely undetectable by the naked eye. The design parameters of the device were optimised for molecular analysis using sampled DNA mass as the primary end point in volunteer studies. Finally, total RNA was characterized. The optimised device extracted 5.9 ± 3.4 ng DNA and 9.0 ± 10.1 ng RNA. We foresee that minimally invasive molecular sampling will play an increasingly significant role in diagnostic dermatology and skin research.

Identifiers

PMID24627782
PMCPMC3907159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.