Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24627302›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2014

Efficient recovery of whole cell proteins in Oenococcus oeni--a comparison of different extraction protocols for high-throughput malolactic starter applications.

Caterina Cafaro, Maria Grazia Bonomo, Rocco Rossano, Marilena Larocca, Giovanni Salzano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of Biofilm Formation byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  2. New Insights Into Cinnamoyl Esterase Activity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caterina CafaroDipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Viale dell'Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100, Potenza, Italy.
Maria Grazia Bonomo
Rocco Rossano
Marilena Larocca
Giovanni Salzano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we compared different total protein extraction protocols to achieve highly efficient isolation and purification of total proteins for the specific protein profiling of Oenococcus oeni. The sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis patterns obtained for the different extraction protocols revealed not only a qualitative similar protein pattern but also quantitative variations with different intensity bands depending on the extraction method used. The selected extraction method added with sonication proved to work extremely well and efficiently and was able to obtain a high-resolution 2-D electrophoresis (2-DE) map. Prominent spots were successfully identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and corresponded to 76 different proteins involved in the main metabolic pathways. The approach allowed to achieve a protein profiling specific for O. oeni from Aglianico wine with numerous characterized protein products corresponding to many different O. oeni genes and associated with main cellular pathways. Further investigations of the 2-DE protein expression profile will provide useful and interesting information on the molecular mechanisms at the protein level responsible for growth and survival of O. oeni in wine.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMolecular BiologyOenococcusSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationWineBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.