ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2014
Concurrent evolution of cancer cachexia and heart failure: bilateral effects exist.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of adjunct testosterone on cardiac morphology and function in advanced cancers: an ancillary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.BMC cancer · 2019Trial
- Li-ginseng powder alleviates cancer cachexia in mice by regulating the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and reducing inflammation.Journal of ginseng research · 2026Article
- 6-Shogaol Attenuates Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Atrophy by Inhibiting E3 Ubiquitin Ligases and Necroptosis.Phytotherapy research : PTR · 2026Article
- Development of an efficient mice model of cancer-associated cardiac cachexia.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Healthcare Management in Cardio-Oncology, Clinical Strategies and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Imaging Cancer-associated Cachexia: Utilizing Clinical Imaging Modalities for Early Diagnosis.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Review
- Berberine Improves Cancer-Derived Myocardial Impairment in Experimental Cachexia Models by Targeting High-Mobility Group Box-1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The Safety and Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Patients with Sarcopenia or Frailty: Double Edged Sword?Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- From Mouth to Muscle: Exploring the Potential Relationship between the Oral Microbiome and Cancer-Related Cachexia.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Mutant p53, the Mevalonate Pathway and the Tumor Microenvironment Regulate Tumor Response to Statin Therapy.Cancers · 2022Review
- Cardiac Remodeling in Cancer-Induced Cachexia: Functional, Structural, and Metabolic Contributors.Cells · 2022Review
- Tumor cell anabolism and host tissue catabolism-energetic inefficiency during cancer cachexia.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Review
- Review
- The impact of the surgical Apgar score on oncological outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Cardiac Complications: The Understudied Aspect of Cancer Cachexia.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2022Review
- Cancer and Associated Therapies Impact the Skeletal Muscle Proteome.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Cardioprotective effects of preconditioning exercise in the female tumor bearing mouse.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Cardiac myocyte intrinsic contractility and calcium handling deficits underlie heart organ dysfunction in murine cancer cachexia.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer cachexia is defined as a multifactorial syndrome of involuntary weight loss characterized by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass and progressive functional impairment. It is postulated that cardiac dysfunction/atrophy parallels skeletal muscle atrophy in cancer cachexia. Cardiotoxic chemotherapy may additionally result in cardiac dysfunction and heart failure in some cancer patients. Heart failure thus may be a consequence of either ongoing cachexia or chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity; at the same time, heart failure can result in cachexia, especially muscle wasting. Therefore, the subsequent heart failure and cardiac cachexia can exacerbate the existing cancer-induced cachexia. We discuss these bilateral effects between cancer cachexia and heart failure in cancer patients. Since cachectic patients are more susceptible to chemotherapy-induced toxicity overall, this may also include increased cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic agents. Patients with cachexia could thus be doubly unfortunate, with cachexia-related cardiac dysfunction/heart failure and increased susceptibility to cardiotoxicity during treatment. Cardiovascular risk factors as well as pre-existing heart failure seem to exacerbate cardiac susceptibility against cachexia and increase the rate of cardiac cachexia. Hence, chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity, cardiovascular risk factors, and pre-existing heart failure may accelerate the vicious cycle of cachexia-heart failure. The impact of cancer cachexia on cardiac dysfunction/heart failure in cancer patients has not been thoroughly studied. A combination of serial echocardiography for detection of cachexia-induced cardiac remodeling and computed tomography image analysis for detection of skeletal muscle wasting would appear a practical and non-invasive approach to develop an understanding of cardiac structural/functional alterations that are directly related to cachexia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.