ArticleHeart and vessels2015
Angiographic result of T-stenting with small protrusion using drug-eluting stents in the management of ischemic side branch: the ARTEMIS study.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized comparison between provisional and routine kissing-balloon technique after main vessel crossover stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions.Heart and vessels · 2017Trial
- Long-term outcome and chest pain in patients with true versus non-true bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents in the TWENTE trial.Heart and vessels · 2016Trial
- Angiographic study of the clinical liaison of drug-eluting stent and paclitaxel-eluting balloon in unifocal side branch ostium stenosis (ASCLEPIUS).Heart and vessels · 2017Article
- Impact of catheter size on reliability of quantitative coronary angiographic measurements (comparison of 4Fr and 6Fr catheters).Heart and vessels · 2016Article
- DK mini-culotte stenting in the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions: a propensity score matching comparison with T-provisional stenting.Heart and vessels · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the mid-term angiographic result of T-stenting with small protrusion (TAP) as the bailout strategy for treating coronary bifurcation lesions. From 2009 to 2012, symptomatic patients who had severe coronary bifurcation stenoses were treated with one-stent strategy using drug-eluting stents, with kissing balloon inflation performed whenever side branch (SB) impingement occurred. TAP was performed if residual diameter stenosis of SB was ≥75%, presence of ≥type B dissection or flow impairment was observed in the SB. Seventy-one patients (83% male, mean age of 61 ± 12 years) were recruited into the study. MEDINA classification 1,1,1 lesions were observed in over 60% of patients. The mean stent size and length in the main vessel (MV) and SB were 2.86 ± 0.43 and 30 ± 12, and 2.45 ± 0.26 and 16 ± 6 mm, respectively. Restudy angiography was performed on 64 (90 %) patients at 9.2 ± 3.9 months. Angiographic restenosis was observed in 8 (12.5%) patients with late lumen loss in the MV and SB being 0.22 ± 0.19 and 0.34 ± 0.37 mm, respectively. The use of TAP as the bailout technique for treating coronary bifurcation lesions is associated with good angiographic outcomes, in terms of late lumen loss and restenosis, at 9 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.