Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24626763›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2014

Do not resuscitate orders and aging: impact of multimorbidity on the decision-making process.

L de Decker, C Annweiler, C Launay, B Fantino, O Beauchet

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Exploring adaptive expertise in residency: the (missed) opportunity of uncertainty.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploration of Medical Trajectories of Stroke Patients Based on Group-Based Trajectory Modeling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Do-not-resuscitate orders in cancer patients: a review of literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Review
  18. Do-not-resuscitate orders and related factors among family surrogates of patients in the emergency department.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L de DeckerOlivier Beauchet, MD, PhD; Department of Neuroscience, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers cedex 9, France; E-mail: olbeauchet@chu-angers.fr; Phone: ++33 2 41 35 45 27; Fax: ++33 2 41 35 48 94.
C Annweiler
C Launay
B Fantino
O Beauchet
Université d'Angers · FRNantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe "Do Not Resuscitate" orders (DNR) are defined as advance medical directives to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiac arrest. Age-related multimorbidity may influence the DNR decision-making process. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data examining the relationship between DNR orders and multimorbidity in older patients.

methodsA systematic Medline and Cochrane literature search limited to human studies published in English and French was conducted on August 2012, with no date limits, using the following Medical Subject Heading terms: "resuscitation orders" OR "do-not-resuscitate" combined with "aged, 80 and over" combined with "comorbidities" OR "chronic diseases".

resultsOf the 65 selected studies, 22 met the selection criteria for inclusion in the qualitative analysis. DNR orders were positively associated with multimorbidity in 21 studies (95%). The meta-analysis included 7 studies with a total of 27,707 participants and 5065 DNR orders. It confirmed that multimorbidity were associated with DNR orders (summary OR = 1.25 [95% CI: 1.19-1.33]). The relationship between DNR orders and multimorbidity differed according to the nature of morbidities; the summary OR for DNR orders was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23) for cognitive impairment, OR=2.58 (95% CI: 2.08-3.20) for cancer, OR=1.07 (95% CI: 0.92-1.24) for heart diseases (i.e., coronary heart disease or congestive heart failure), and OR=1.97 (95% CI: 1.61-2.40) for stroke.

conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis showed that DNR orders are positively associated with multimorbidity, and especially with three morbidities, which are cognitive impairment, cancer and stroke.

Indexed as

ComorbidityDecision MakingResuscitation OrdersAdvance DirectivesAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChronic DiseaseCognition DisordersFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMedical Subject HeadingsMiddle AgedNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24626763
PMCPMC12880296
OpenAlexW2013483667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.