Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24626473›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Functional gene group analysis indicates no role for heterotrimeric G proteins in cognitive ability.

W David Hill, Christiaan de Leeuw, Gail Davies, David Cherry McLachlan Liewald, Anthony Payton, Leone C A Craig, Lawrence J Whalley, Mike Horan, William Ollier, John M Starr and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

W David HillCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Christiaan de LeeuwCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Complex Trait Genetics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gail DaviesCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
David Cherry McLachlan LiewaldCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Anthony PaytonCentre for Integrated Genomic Medical Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Leone C A CraigPublic Health Nutrition Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Lawrence J WhalleyInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Mike HoranCentre for Clinical and Cognitive Neurosciences, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
William OllierCentre for Integrated Genomic Medical Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
John M StarrCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Neil PendletonCentre for Integrated Genomic Medical Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Danielle PosthumaCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Complex Trait Genetics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Sophia Child Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Timothy C BatesCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ian J DearyCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F019394/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F022441/1Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/505Chief Scientist Office ETM/55Medical Research Council G0700704Medical Research Council G1001245Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Wellcome Trust 102215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous functional gene group analyses implicated common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in heterotrimeric G protein coding genes as being associated with differences in human intelligence. Here, we sought to replicate this finding using five independent cohorts of older adults including current IQ and childhood IQ, and using both gene- and SNP-based analytic strategies. No significant associations were found between variation in heterotrimeric G protein genes and intelligence in any cohort at either of the two time points. These results indicate that, whereas G protein systems are important in cognition, common genetic variation in these genes is unlikely to be a substantial influence on human intelligence differences.

Indexed as

CognitionGenetic Association StudiesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsHumansIntelligenceIntelligence TestsMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24626473
PMCPMC3953514
OpenAlexW2100433011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.