Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24626328›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2014

Eosinophils are important for protection, immunoregulation and pathology during infection with nematode microfilariae.

Emma T Cadman, Katherine A Thysse, Siobhan Bearder, Anita Y N Cheung, Ashleigh C Johnston, James J Lee, Rachel A Lawrence

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Living without eosinophils: evidence from mouse and man.The European respiratory journal · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NKp46Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in preclinical platforms ofFrontiers in tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Deciphering the role of eosinophils in solid organ transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma T CadmanThe Royal Veterinary College, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Katherine A ThysseThe Royal Veterinary College, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Siobhan BearderThe Royal Veterinary College, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Anita Y N CheungThe Royal Veterinary College, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Ashleigh C JohnstonThe Royal Veterinary College, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
James J LeeDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America.
Rachel A LawrenceThe Royal Veterinary College, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Royal Veterinary College · GBMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D013550/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F011180/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophil responses typify both allergic and parasitic helminth disease. In helminthic disease, the role of eosinophils can be both protective in immune responses and destructive in pathological responses. To investigate whether eosinophils are involved in both protection and pathology during filarial nematode infection, we explored the role of eosinophils and their granule proteins, eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and major basic protein-1 (MBP-1), during infection with Brugia malayi microfilariae. Using eosinophil-deficient mice (PHIL), we further clarify the role of eosinophils in clearance of microfilariae during primary, but not challenge infection in vivo. Deletion of EPO or MBP-1 alone was insufficient to abrogate parasite clearance suggesting that either these molecules are redundant or eosinophils act indirectly in parasite clearance via augmentation of other protective responses. Absence of eosinophils increased mast cell recruitment, but not other cell types, into the broncho-alveolar lavage fluid during challenge infection. In addition absence of eosinophils or EPO alone, augmented parasite-induced IgE responses, as measured by ELISA, demonstrating that eosinophils are involved in regulation of IgE. Whole body plethysmography indicated that nematode-induced changes in airway physiology were reduced in challenge infection in the absence of eosinophils and also during primary infection in the absence of EPO alone. However lack of eosinophils or MBP-1 actually increased goblet cell mucus production. We did not find any major differences in cytokine responses in the absence of eosinophils, EPO or MBP-1. These results reveal that eosinophils actively participate in regulation of IgE and goblet cell mucus production via granule secretion during nematode-induced pathology and highlight their importance both as effector cells, as damage-inducing cells and as supervisory cells that shape both innate and adaptive immunity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrugia malayiDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEosinophilsFilariasisMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMicrofilariae

Identifiers

PMID24626328
PMCPMC3953434
OpenAlexW2087382727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.