Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24626201›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Model-based analysis for qualitative data: an application in Drosophila germline stem cell regulation.

Michael Pargett, Ann E Rundell, Gregery T Buzzard, David M Umulis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SupportingPRIMUS : problems, resources, and issues in mathematics undergraduate studies · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael PargettWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Ann E RundellWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Gregery T BuzzardDepartment of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
David M UmulisAgricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

Systems Analysis of BMP Regulation in Developing Zebrafish EmbryosR01HD073156 · NICHD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI UMULIS, DAVID MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS HD73156NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery in developmental biology is often driven by intuition that relies on the integration of multiple types of data such as fluorescent images, phenotypes, and the outcomes of biochemical assays. Mathematical modeling helps elucidate the biological mechanisms at play as the networks become increasingly large and complex. However, the available data is frequently under-utilized due to incompatibility with quantitative model tuning techniques. This is the case for stem cell regulation mechanisms explored in the Drosophila germarium through fluorescent immunohistochemistry. To enable better integration of biological data with modeling in this and similar situations, we have developed a general parameter estimation process to quantitatively optimize models with qualitative data. The process employs a modified version of the Optimal Scaling method from social and behavioral sciences, and multi-objective optimization to evaluate the trade-off between fitting different datasets (e.g. wild type vs. mutant). Using only published imaging data in the germarium, we first evaluated support for a published intracellular regulatory network by considering alternative connections of the same regulatory players. Simply screening networks against wild type data identified hundreds of feasible alternatives. Of these, five parsimonious variants were found and compared by multi-objective analysis including mutant data and dynamic constraints. With these data, the current model is supported over the alternatives, but support for a biochemically observed feedback element is weak (i.e. these data do not measure the feedback effect well). When also comparing new hypothetical models, the available data do not discriminate. To begin addressing the limitations in data, we performed a model-based experiment design and provide recommendations for experiments to refine model parameters and discriminate increasingly complex hypotheses.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyDrosophilaEndocytosisFluorescent DyesGene Expression ProfilingImmunohistochemistryModels, TheoreticalMutationPhenotypeStem CellsFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID24626201
PMCPMC3952817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.