Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24626182›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2014

Tumor suppressor roles of CENP-E and Nsl1 in Drosophila epithelial tissues.

Marta Clemente-Ruiz, Mariana Muzzopappa, Marco Milán

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unveiling the Tumor Suppressors: Insights from Drosophila.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Is aneuploidy deciding your fate?Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta Clemente-RuizInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona); Barcelona, Spain.
Mariana MuzzopappaInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona); Barcelona, Spain.
Marco MilánInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona); Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA); Barcelona, Spain.
Institute for Research in Biomedicine · ESInstitute for Research in Biomedicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depletion of spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) genes in Drosophila epithelial tissues leads to JNK-dependent programmed cell death and additional blockade of the apoptotic program drives tumorigenesis. A recent report proposes that chromosomal instability (CIN) is not the driving force in the tumorigenic response of the SAC-deficient tissue, and that checkpoint proteins exert a SAC-independent tumor suppressor role. This notion is based on observations that the depletion of CENP-E levels or prevention of Bub3 from binding to the kinetochore in Drosophila tissues unable to activate the apoptotic program induces CIN but does not cause hyperproliferation. Here we re-examined this proposal. In contrast to the previous report, we observed that depletion of CENP-E or Nsl1-the latter mediating kinetochore targeting of Bub3-in epithelial tissues unable to activate the apoptotic program induces significant levels of aneuploidy and drives tumor-like growth. The induction of the JNK transcriptional targets Wingless, a mitogenic molecule, and MMP1, a matrix metaloproteinase 1 involved in basement membrane degradation was also observed in these tumors. An identical response of the tissue was previously detected upon depletion of several SAC genes or genes involved in spindle assembly, chromatin condensation, and cytokinesis, all of which have been described to cause CIN. All together, these results reinforce the role of CIN in driving tumorigenesis in Drosophila epithelial tissues and question the proposed SAC-independent roles of checkpoint proteins in suppressing tumorigenesis. Differences in aneuploidy rates might explain the discrepancy between the previous report and our results.

Indexed as

AneuploidyAnimalsApoptosisChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEpitheliumMatrix Metalloproteinase 1Nuclear ProteinsSpindle ApparatusTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor ProteinsVesicular Transport ProteinsWnt1 Proteincentromere protein EChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophila ProteinsMatrix Metalloproteinase 1NSL1 protein, DrosophilaNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor ProteinsVesicular Transport Proteinswg protein, DrosophilaWnt1 ProteinCINJNKmitotic checkpointtumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID24626182
PMCPMC4050142
OpenAlexW2015863570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.