Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24625862›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Sex chromosome turnover contributes to genomic divergence between incipient stickleback species.

Kohta Yoshida, Takashi Makino, Katsushi Yamaguchi, Shuji Shigenobu, Mitsuyasu Hasebe, Masakado Kawata, Manabu Kume, Seiichi Mori, Catherine L Peichel, Atsushi Toyoda and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Searching for signatures of sexually antagonistic selection on stickleback sex chromosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kohta YoshidaEcological Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takashi MakinoDivision of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Katsushi YamaguchiNIBB Core Research Facilities, National Institute for Basic Biology, Myodaiji, Okazaki, Japan.
Shuji ShigenobuNIBB Core Research Facilities, National Institute for Basic Biology, Myodaiji, Okazaki, Japan; School of Life Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Okazaki, Japan.
Mitsuyasu HasebeSchool of Life Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Okazaki, Japan; Division of Evolutionary Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Myodaiji, Okazaki, Japan.
Masakado KawataDivision of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan.
Manabu KumeBiological Laboratories, Gifu-keizai-University, Gifu, Japan.
Seiichi MoriBiological Laboratories, Gifu-keizai-University, Gifu, Japan.
Catherine L PeichelDivisions of Human Biology and Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Atsushi ToyodaComparative Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Shizuoka, Japan.
Asao FujiyamaComparative Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Shizuoka, Japan.
Jun KitanoEcological Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Shizuoka, Japan; PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex chromosomes turn over rapidly in some taxonomic groups, where closely related species have different sex chromosomes. Although there are many examples of sex chromosome turnover, we know little about the functional roles of sex chromosome turnover in phenotypic diversification and genomic evolution. The sympatric pair of Japanese threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) provides an excellent system to address these questions: the Japan Sea species has a neo-sex chromosome system resulting from a fusion between an ancestral Y chromosome and an autosome, while the sympatric Pacific Ocean species has a simple XY sex chromosome system. Furthermore, previous quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping demonstrated that the Japan Sea neo-X chromosome contributes to phenotypic divergence and reproductive isolation between these sympatric species. To investigate the genomic basis for the accumulation of genes important for speciation on the neo-X chromosome, we conducted whole genome sequencing of males and females of both the Japan Sea and the Pacific Ocean species. No substantial degeneration has yet occurred on the neo-Y chromosome, but the nucleotide sequence of the neo-X and the neo-Y has started to diverge, particularly at regions near the fusion. The neo-sex chromosomes also harbor an excess of genes with sex-biased expression. Furthermore, genes on the neo-X chromosome showed higher non-synonymous substitution rates than autosomal genes in the Japan Sea lineage. Genomic regions of higher sequence divergence between species, genes with divergent expression between species, and QTL for inter-species phenotypic differences were found not only at the regions near the fusion site, but also at other regions along the neo-X chromosome. Neo-sex chromosomes can therefore accumulate substitutions causing species differences even in the absence of substantial neo-Y degeneration.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemaleJapanMaleQuantitative Trait LociReproductive IsolationSmegmamorphaX ChromosomeY Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID24625862
PMCPMC3953013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.