Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24625764›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A method for predicting protein-protein interaction types.

Yael Silberberg, Martin Kupiec, Roded Sharan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Signing protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. D'or: deep orienter of protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An optimization framework for network annotation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Multi-label ℓScientific reports · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yael SilberbergDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Martin KupiecDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Roded SharanThe Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) govern basic cellular processes through signal transduction and complex formation. The diversity of those processes gives rise to a remarkable diversity of interactions types, ranging from transient phosphorylation interactions to stable covalent bonding. Despite our increasing knowledge on PPIs in humans and other species, their types remain relatively unexplored and few annotations of types exist in public databases. Here, we propose the first method for systematic prediction of PPI type based solely on the techniques by which the interaction was detected. We show that different detection methods are better suited for detecting specific types. We apply our method to ten interaction types on a large scale human PPI dataset. We evaluate the performance of the method using both internal cross validation and external data sources. In cross validation, we obtain an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve ranging from 0.65 to 0.97 with an average of 0.84 across the predicted types. Comparing the predicted interaction types to external data sources, we obtained significant agreements for phosphorylation and ubiquitination interactions, with hypergeometric p-value = 2.3e(-54) and 5.6e(-28) respectively. We examine the biological relevance of our predictions using known signaling pathways and chart the abundance of interaction types in cell processes. Finally, we investigate the cross-relations between different interaction types within the network and characterize the discovered patterns, or motifs. We expect the resulting annotated network to facilitate the reconstruction of process-specific subnetworks and assist in predicting protein function or interaction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid MotifsArea Under CurveComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansLogistic ModelsPhosphorylationProtein Interaction MappingProteinsRegression AnalysisROC CurveSignal TransductionSoftwareUbiquitinationProteins

Identifiers

PMID24625764
PMCPMC3953217
OpenAlexW2029476889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.