ArticlePloS one2014
A method for predicting protein-protein interaction types.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Signing protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- DCMF-PPI: a protein-protein interaction predictor based on dynamic condition and multi-feature fusion.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- D'or: deep orienter of protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- AFTGAN: prediction of multi-type PPI based on attention free transformer and graph attention network.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Long-distance dependency combined multi-hop graph neural networks for protein-protein interactions prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Multifaceted protein-protein interaction prediction based on Siamese residual RCNN.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- A systematic approach to orient the human protein-protein interaction network.Nature communications · 2019Article
- An optimization framework for network annotation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- HAPPI-2: a Comprehensive and High-quality Map of Human Annotated and Predicted Protein Interactions.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Multi-label ℓScientific reports · 2016Article
- DEEPN as an Approach for Batch Processing of Yeast 2-Hybrid Interactions.Cell reports · 2016Article
- Multi-label multi-instance transfer learning for simultaneous reconstruction and cross-talk modeling of multiple human signaling pathways.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) govern basic cellular processes through signal transduction and complex formation. The diversity of those processes gives rise to a remarkable diversity of interactions types, ranging from transient phosphorylation interactions to stable covalent bonding. Despite our increasing knowledge on PPIs in humans and other species, their types remain relatively unexplored and few annotations of types exist in public databases. Here, we propose the first method for systematic prediction of PPI type based solely on the techniques by which the interaction was detected. We show that different detection methods are better suited for detecting specific types. We apply our method to ten interaction types on a large scale human PPI dataset. We evaluate the performance of the method using both internal cross validation and external data sources. In cross validation, we obtain an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve ranging from 0.65 to 0.97 with an average of 0.84 across the predicted types. Comparing the predicted interaction types to external data sources, we obtained significant agreements for phosphorylation and ubiquitination interactions, with hypergeometric p-value = 2.3e(-54) and 5.6e(-28) respectively. We examine the biological relevance of our predictions using known signaling pathways and chart the abundance of interaction types in cell processes. Finally, we investigate the cross-relations between different interaction types within the network and characterize the discovered patterns, or motifs. We expect the resulting annotated network to facilitate the reconstruction of process-specific subnetworks and assist in predicting protein function or interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.