Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24625580›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

DNA dynamics during early double-strand break processing revealed by non-intrusive imaging of living cells.

Hicham Saad, Franck Gallardo, Mathieu Dalvai, Nicolas Tanguy-le-Gac, David Lane, Kerstin Bystricky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Meiotic cohesin Rec8 imposes fitness costs on fission yeast gametes favoring the evolution of parental bias in gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hicham SaadUniversity of Toulouse, UPS, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote, CNRS, UMR5099, Toulouse, France.
Franck GallardoUniversity of Toulouse, UPS, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote, CNRS, UMR5099, Toulouse, France; Institut des Technologies Avancées en sciences du Vivant, ITAV, Toulouse, France.
Mathieu DalvaiUniversity of Toulouse, UPS, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote, CNRS, UMR5099, Toulouse, France.
Nicolas Tanguy-le-GacUniversity of Toulouse, UPS, Toulouse, France; Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Toulouse, France.
David LaneUniversity of Toulouse, UPS, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CNRS, UMR5100, Toulouse, France.
Kerstin BystrickyUniversity of Toulouse, UPS, Toulouse, France; Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote, CNRS, UMR5099, Toulouse, France; Institut des Technologies Avancées en sciences du Vivant, ITAV, Toulouse, France.
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome breakage is a major threat to genome integrity. The most accurate way to repair DNA double strand breaks (DSB) is homologous recombination (HR) with an intact copy of the broken locus. Mobility of the broken DNA has been seen to increase during the search for a donor copy. Observing chromosome dynamics during the earlier steps of HR, mainly the resection from DSB ends that generates recombinogenic single strands, requires a visualization system that does not interfere with the process, and is small relative to the few kilobases of DNA that undergo processing. Current visualization tools, based on binding of fluorescent repressor proteins to arrays of specific binding sites, have the major drawback that highly-repeated DNA and lengthy stretches of strongly bound protein can obstruct chromatin function. We have developed a new, non-intrusive method which uses protein oligomerization rather than operator multiplicity to form visible foci. By applying it to HO cleavage of the MAT locus on Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III, we provide the first real-time analysis of resection in single living cells. Monitoring the dynamics of a chromatin locus next to a DSB revealed transient confinement of the damaged chromatin region during the very early steps of resection, consistent with the need to keep DNA ends in contact. Resection in a yku70 mutant began ∼ 10 min earlier than in wild type, defining this as the period of commitment to homology-dependent repair. Beyond the insights into the dynamics and mechanism of resection, our new DNA-labelling and -targeting method will be widely applicable to fine-scale analysis of genome organization, dynamics and function in normal and pathological contexts.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedChromatinChromosomes, FungalDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairGenome, FungalHomologous RecombinationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeChromatinDNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24625580
PMCPMC3952824
OpenAlexW2073378063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.