Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24625543›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Suicidal autointegration of sleeping beauty and piggyBac transposons in eukaryotic cells.

Yongming Wang, Jichang Wang, Anatharam Devaraj, Manvendra Singh, Ana Jimenez Orgaz, Jia-Xuan Chen, Matthias Selbach, Zoltán Ivics, Zsuzsanna Izsvák

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. HMGXB4 TargetsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Jumping Ahead withViruses · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. RareFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yongming WangMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin, Germany; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jichang WangMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Anatharam DevarajMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Manvendra SinghMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Ana Jimenez OrgazMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Jia-Xuan ChenMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Matthias SelbachMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Zoltán IvicsPaul-Ehrlich-Institute, Division of Medical Biotechnology, Langen, Germany.
Zsuzsanna IzsvákMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
Max Delbrück Center · DEFudan University · CNPaul Ehrlich Institut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposons are discrete segments of DNA that have the distinctive ability to move and replicate within genomes across the tree of life. 'Cut and paste' DNA transposition involves excision from a donor locus and reintegration into a new locus in the genome. We studied molecular events following the excision steps of two eukaryotic DNA transposons, Sleeping Beauty (SB) and piggyBac (PB) that are widely used for genome manipulation in vertebrate species. SB originates from fish and PB from insects; thus, by introducing these transposons to human cells we aimed to monitor the process of establishing a transposon-host relationship in a naïve cellular environment. Similarly to retroviruses, neither SB nor PB is capable of self-avoidance because a significant portion of the excised transposons integrated back into its own genome in a suicidal process called autointegration. Barrier-to-autointegration factor (BANF1), a cellular co-factor of certain retroviruses, inhibited transposon autointegration, and was detected in higher-order protein complexes containing the SB transposase. Increasing size sensitized transposition for autointegration, consistent with elevated vulnerability of larger transposons. Both SB and PB were affected similarly by the size of the transposon in three different assays: excision, autointegration and productive transposition. Prior to reintegration, SB is completely separated from the donor molecule and followed an unbiased autointegration pattern, not associated with local hopping. Self-disruptive autointegration occurred at similar frequency for both transposons, while aberrant, pseudo-transposition events were more frequently observed for PB.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsEukaryotic CellsGenes, Transgenic, SuicideHeLa CellsHumansNuclear ProteinsTransposasesBANF1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsNuclear ProteinsTransposases

Identifiers

PMID24625543
PMCPMC3952818
OpenAlexW2071308582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.