ArticlePloS one2014
A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing Critical Sources of Carbon Emissions Using Principal Component Analysis.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
- Article
- A cautionary tale about urban trees: could ecoservice monetary estimates become economic sleights of hand?Bioscience · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Aquatic Biodiversity Research: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Review.Biology · 2025Review
- Population health management through human phenotype ontology with policy for ecosystem improvement.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Natural capital accounting as a decision support tool for environmental management of a protected area in Madagascar.PloS one · 2025Article
- Dynamic evolution trend and driving mechanisms of water conservation in the Yellow River Basin, China.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Natural capital approaches for the optimal design of policies for nature recovery.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Assessing vegetation cover and valuing ecosystem services in southwestern Ethiopia: Implications for conservation.PloS one · 2024Article
- Model ensembles of ecosystem services fill global certainty and capacity gaps.Science advances · 2023Article
- Article
- Scientific modelling can be accessible, interoperable and user friendly: A case study for pasture and livestock modelling in Spain.PloS one · 2023Article
- Trade-offs Between the Value of Ecosystem Services and Connectivity Among Protected Areas in the Upper Chattahoochee Watershed.Environmental management · 2022Article
- The global environmental agenda urgently needs a semantic web of knowledge.Environmental evidence · 2022Article
- Ecological restoration of agricultural land can improve its contribution to economic development.PloS one · 2021Article
- Towards more sustainable agricultural landscapes: Lessons from Northwestern Mexico and the Western Highlands of Guatemala.Futures · 2020Article
- Accounting for changes in flood control delivered by ecosystems at the EU level.Ecosystem services · 2020Article
- Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast.Ecosystem services · 2020Article
- Fragmentation and thresholds in hydrological flow-based ecosystem services.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecosystem Services (ES) are an established conceptual framework for attributing value to the benefits that nature provides to humans. As the promise of robust ES-driven management is put to the test, shortcomings in our ability to accurately measure, map, and value ES have surfaced. On the research side, mainstream methods for ES assessment still fall short of addressing the complex, multi-scale biophysical and socioeconomic dynamics inherent in ES provision, flow, and use. On the practitioner side, application of methods remains onerous due to data and model parameterization requirements. Further, it is increasingly clear that the dominant "one model fits all" paradigm is often ill-suited to address the diversity of real-world management situations that exist across the broad spectrum of coupled human-natural systems. This article introduces an integrated ES modeling methodology, named ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services), which aims to introduce improvements on these fronts. To improve conceptual detail and representation of ES dynamics, it adopts a uniform conceptualization of ES that gives equal emphasis to their production, flow and use by society, while keeping model complexity low enough to enable rapid and inexpensive assessment in many contexts and for multiple services. To improve fit to diverse application contexts, the methodology is assisted by model integration technologies that allow assembly of customized models from a growing model base. By using computer learning and reasoning, model structure may be specialized for each application context without requiring costly expertise. In this article we discuss the founding principles of ARIES--both its innovative aspects for ES science and as an example of a new strategy to support more accurate decision making in diverse application contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.