Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24625454›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2014

Prognostic factors for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the R(X)CHOP era.

R Vaidya, T E Witzig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Ro 08-2750 increases radiation-induced cytotoxicity in DLBCL by dysregulating the DNA damage response.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R VaidyaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, USA.
T E WitzigDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, USA. Electronic address: witzig.thomas@mayo.edu.

Funding

The Role of Monocytes in non-Hodgkin LymphomaP50CA097274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEINER, GEORGE J. · 2002 to 2021
$45.7M
Signal transduction inhibitor therapy for LymphomaR01CA127433 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WITZIG, THOMAS E. · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA97274NCI NIH HHS R01CA127433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of rituximab (R) to conventional CHOP chemotherapy for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) led to an unequivocal improvement in survival, establishing RCHOP as the standard of care. Still, nearly 40% of DLBCL patients will eventually die of relapsed disease. Efforts to improve outcomes by addition of new biologic agents (X) to the RCHOP backbone are underway. In this era of R(X)CHOP, it is imperative to develop prognostic and predictive markers, not only to identify patients who will suffer a particularly aggressive course, but also to accurately select patients for clinical trials from which they will most benefit.

designThe following review was undertaken to describe prognostic factors in DLBCL, with emphasis on markers that are accurate, relatively available, and clinically applicable in 2014.

resultsThe International Prognostic Index retains its validity in the era of RCHOP, although with limited ability to predict those with <50% chance of long-term survival. Gene expression profiling has provided novel insights into the biology of DLBCL and led to the development of immunohistochemistry (IHC) algorithms that are in routine practice. Identification of a 'double-hit' (DH) lymphoma by fluorescent in situ hybridization with aberrations involving MYC and/or BCL2 and BCL6 genes has important implications due to its extremely dismal prognosis with RCHOP. Other markers such as the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), serum immunoglobulin free light chains, vitamin D levels, serum cytokines/chemokines, and imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) have all shown promise as future predictive/prognostic tests.

conclusionsThe future for new treatment options in DLBCL is promising with current clinical trials testing novel targeted agents such as bortezomib, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib as the 'X' in R(X)CHOP. Predictive factors are required to select and randomize patients appropriately for these trials. We envision the day when 'X' will be chosen based on the biological characteristics of the tumor.

Indexed as

PrognosisAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinHumansImmunoglobulin Light ChainsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphocyte CountLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMonocytesPrednisoneProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRituximabAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinImmunoglobulin Light ChainsPrednisoneProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRituximabVincristineVitamin Ddouble hitlarge celllymphomanon-Hodgkinprognosis

Identifiers

PMID24625454
PMCPMC4288137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.