ReviewGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2014
Social and behavioral research in genomic sequencing: approaches from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium Outcomes and Measures Working Group.
Review in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03832985 (Reporting Adult-Onset Genomic Results to Pediatric Biobank Participants and Parents), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reporting Adult-Onset Genomic Results to Pediatric Biobank Participants and Parents
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- The ENGAGE study: a 3-arm randomized hybrid type 1 effectiveness and implementation study of an in-home, collaborative PCP model of remote telegenetic services to increase uptake of cancer genetic services in childhood cancer survivors.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Effects of participation in a U.S. trial of newborn genomic sequencing on parents at risk for depression.Journal of genetic counseling · 2022Trial
- Perceptions of uncertainties about carrier results identified by exome sequencing in a randomized controlled trial.Translational behavioral medicine · 2020Trial
- A randomized study of digital versus genetic counselor return of actionable genetic research results to biobank participants (RESPECT3 study).BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Outcomes from a Novel Approach to Studying Consumer Genetic Testing for Germline Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Article
- An eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Predisposition in Patients With Metastatic Cancers: Protocol for a Randomized Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- A roadmap for genome projects to foster psychosocial and economic evidence to further policy and practice.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- Perspectives of parents receiving normal results from genomic newborn screening: a mixed-methods evaluation from the early check program.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Lessons learned during the process of reporting individual genomic results to participants of a population-based biobank.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Equity in Genomic Medicine.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022Review
- A Framework for Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Genetics and Genomics Research.JAMA health forum · 2022Article
- Precise, Genotype-First Breast Cancer Prevention: Experience With Transferring Monogenic Findings From a Population Biobank to the Clinical Setting.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Behavioral and psychological impact of genome sequencing: a pilot randomized trial of primary care and cardiology patients.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Population Genomic Screening for Genetic Etiologies of Neurodevelopmental/Psychiatric Disorders Demonstrates Personal Utility and Positive Participant Responses.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Family-level impact of genetic testing: integrating health economics and ethical, legal, and social implications.Personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Genotype-first approach to the detection of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk, and effects of risk disclosure to biobank participants.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Roles of attitudes and injunctive norms in decisional conflict and disclosure following receipt of genome sequencing results.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The routine use of genomic sequencing in clinical medicine has the potential to dramatically alter patient care and medical outcomes. To fully understand the psychosocial and behavioral impact of sequencing integration into clinical practice, it is imperative that we identify the factors that influence sequencing-related decision making and patient outcomes. In an effort to develop a collaborative and conceptually grounded approach to studying sequencing adoption, members of the National Human Genome Research Institute's Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium formed the Outcomes and Measures Working Group. Here we highlight the priority areas of investigation and psychosocial and behavioral outcomes identified by the Working Group. We also review some of the anticipated challenges to measurement in social and behavioral research related to genomic sequencing; opportunities for instrument development; and the importance of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches. This work represents the early, shared efforts of multiple research teams as we strive to understand individuals' experiences with genomic sequencing. The resulting body of knowledge will guide recommendations for the optimal use of sequencing in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.