Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24625003›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens.

Torsten Nielsen, Brett Wallden, Carl Schaper, Sean Ferree, Shuzhen Liu, Dongxia Gao, Garrett Barry, Naeem Dowidar, Malini Maysuria, James Storhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Triple-Negative PAM50 Non-Basal Breast Cancer Subtype Predicts Benefit from Extended Adjuvant Capecitabine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The immune profile of small HER2-positive breast cancers: a secondary analysis from the APT trial.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Torsten NielsenBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, 3427 - 600 W 10TH Avenue, V5Z 4E6 Vancouver, BC, Canada. torsten@mail.ubc.ca.
Brett Wallden
Carl Schaper
Sean Ferree
Shuzhen Liu
Dongxia Gao
Garrett Barry
Naeem Dowidar
Malini Maysuria
James Storhoff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNanoString's Prosigna™ Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay is based on the PAM50 gene expression signature. The test outputs a risk of recurrence (ROR) score, risk category, and intrinsic subtype (Luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like). The studies described here were designed to validate the analytical performance of the test on the nCounter Analysis System across multiple laboratories.

methodsAnalytical precision was measured by testing five breast tumor RNA samples across 3 sites. Reproducibility was measured by testing replicate tissue sections from 43 FFPE breast tumor blocks across 3 sites following independent pathology review at each site. The RNA input range was validated by comparing assay results at the extremes of the specified range to the nominal RNA input level. Interference was evaluated by including non-tumor tissue into the test.

resultsThe measured standard deviation (SD) was less than 1 ROR unit within the analytical precision study and the measured total SD was 2.9 ROR units within the reproducibility study. The ROR scores for RNA inputs at the extremes of the range were the same as those at the nominal input level. Assay results were stable in the presence of moderate amounts of surrounding non-tumor tissue (<70% by area).

conclusionsThe analytical performance of NanoString's Prosigna assay has been validated using FFPE breast tumor specimens across multiple clinical testing laboratories.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFormaldehydeGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansParaffin EmbeddingPathology, MolecularPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRNAValidation Studies as TopicBiomarkers, TumorFormaldehydeRNA

Identifiers

PMID24625003
PMCPMC4008304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.